Cited by 88Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesNeural Networks and Applications

Unsupervised learning of invariant representations

Open access
Anselmi, Fabio, Leibo, Joel Z., Rosasco, Lorenzo, Mutch, Jim, Tacchetti, Andrea, Poggio, Tomaso·2016·Theoretical Computer Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tcs.2015.06.048

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One way of allowing networks to have one-shot properties is I-theory, in the context of learning invariant representations for object recognition.

    “One way of allowing networks to have such properties is what is described by I-theory, in the context of learning invariant representations for object recognition (Anselmi et al., 2015).”

    From Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience (2016) · cites this paper as Anselmi et al., 2015

  • I-theory aims to show that you can invariantly and discriminatively represent objects using a single sample, even of a new class.

    “The theories then aim to show that you can invariantly and discriminatively represent objects using a single sample, even of a new class (Anselmi et al., 2015)24.”

    From Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience (2016) · cites this paper as Anselmi et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. C. Zhang, S. Voinea, G. Evangelopoulos, L. Rosasco, T. Poggio, Phone classifica- (NIPS). Lake Tahoe, NV., 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anselmi, F., Leibo, J. Z., Rosasco, L., Mutch, J., Tacchetti, A., & Poggio, T.
Affiliations
  • Italian Institute of Technology (IT)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Poggio, Tomaso
Venue
Theoretical Computer Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
633
Pages
112-121
ISSN
0304-3975 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W937846259
Cited by
88
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 3
FWCI
11.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Theoretical Computer Science (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • NSF (CCF-1231216)
  • National Science Foundation (NSF-0640097, NSF-0827427)
  • AFSOR-THRL (FA8650-05-C-7262)
  • Eugene McDermott Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
unsupervised learning, invariant representations, visual object recognition, group transformation, image patches, deep learning architectures, hierarchical representation, speech recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review