The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How mismatching institutional logics hinder niche–regime interaction and how boundary spanners intervene
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Geels, F. W. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8 · Cited by 7,275
From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems
Geels, F. W. (2004) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015 · Cited by 4,098
Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics
Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840609104803 · Cited by 1,821
The Competent Boundary Spanner
Williams, P. (2002) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00296 · Cited by 1,311 · cited 4×
“Boundary spanning individuals are found to be ‘pivotal’ in the management of inter-organizational relationships (Williams, 2002), especially in situations of ‘no contact, disturbed or otherwise dysfunctional contact’ (Klerkx et al., 2010: 398).”
BackgroundInfluentialBoundary Organizations: Enabling Collaboration among Unexpected Allies
O'Mahony, S., & Bechky, B. A. (2008) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.53.3.422 · Cited by 626
Anchoring of innovations: Assessing Dutch efforts to harvest energy from glasshouses
Elzen, B., van Mierlo, B., & Leeuwis, C. (2012) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2012.10.006 · Cited by 221
Green tides in Brittany: What can we learn about niche–regime interactions?
Diaz, M., Darnhofer, I., Darrot, C., & Beuret, J.-E. (2013) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2013.04.002 · Cited by 130
Wesseling, J. H., Niesten, E. M. M. I., Faber, J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2015) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1834 · Cited by 128
Self-citation
Cited by
An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions
Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., et al. (2019) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004 · Cited by 2,800
Geels, F. W. (2018) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.010 · Cited by 429
Geels, F. W. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119894 · Cited by 426
Passing the baton: How intermediaries advance sustainability transitions in different phases
Kivimaa, P., Hyysalo, S., Boon, W., Klerkx, L., Martiskainen, M., & Schot, J. (2019) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.001 · Cited by 258
Scale dynamics of grassroots innovations through parallel pathways of transformative change
Hermans, F., Roep, D., & Klerkx, L. (2016) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.011 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Smink, M., Negro, S. O., Niesten, E., & Hekkert, M. P.
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 100
- Pages
- 225-237
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W946529684
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 7.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How mismatching institutional logics hinder niche–regime interaction and how boundary spanners intervene. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.004
- The paper
- Smink, M., Negro, S. O., Niesten, E., & Hekkert, M. P. (2015). How mismatching institutional logics hinder niche–regime interaction and how boundary spanners intervene. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
