The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How intermediary organizations facilitate university–industry technology transfer: A proximity approach
Open accessAbstract
The literature on university–industry (U–I) links has revealed many barriers that impede U–I technology transfer. A growing number of intermediary organizations, such as Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs), University Incubators (UIs), and Collaborative Research Centres (CRCs) have been established to mitigate such barriers. While the activities and effects of such intermediaries are frequently studied, conceptual understandings of how these organizations facilitate technology transfer are lacking. Our case study of nine Italian intermediary organizations shows that different types of intermediary organizations address the same fundamental issue of bridging the different logics of academia and industry in different ways. Based on a proximity approach, we develop a theoretical framework explaining how intermediary organizations can reduce cognitive, geographical, organizational, and social distance in U–I collaborations. Intermediary organizations address different proximity dimensions depending on the prior experience of academic and industrial actors and the nature of the knowledge that is transferred. In particular, TTOs focus more on improving cognitive and organizational dimensions, whereas UIs and CRCs attempt to reduce social and geographical distance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.
Ellis, C., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074814 · Cited by 29,249
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428112452151 · Cited by 13,227
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4 · Cited by 8,559
(1993) · Cited by 7,856
Męcfal, S. (2012) · University of Lodz Repository (University of Łódź) · Cited by 6,617
Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment
Boschma, R. (2005) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887 · Cited by 6,055
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/210361 · Cited by 3,232
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., et al. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007 · Cited by 2,552
Self-citationToward a new economics of science
Partha, D., & David, P. A. (1994) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1 · Cited by 2,448
Identity Ambiguity and Change in the Wake of a Corporate Spin-off
Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2004) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4131471 · Cited by 2,215
Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation
Howells, J. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005 · Cited by 2,053
The institutional logics perspective: a new approach to culture, structure, and process
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-2388 · Cited by 1,936
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00196-2 · Cited by 1,702
Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility
Rosenkopf, L., & Almeida, P. (2003) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.6.751.16026 · Cited by 1,681
Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration
Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006 · Cited by 1,400
Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions
Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.1.240 · Cited by 1,159
Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies
Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00107-0 · Cited by 1,057
Proximity and inter‐organizational collaboration: A literature review
Knoben, J., & Oerlemans, L. A. G. (2006) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00121.x · Cited by 989
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006 · Cited by 890
Business incubators and new venture creation: an assessment of incubating models
Grimaldi, R., & Grandi, A. (2005) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/s0166-4972(03)00076-2 · Cited by 803
Self-citationKlerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2009) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.001 · Cited by 674
Proximity and Innovation: From Statics to Dynamics
Balland, P.-A., Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2015) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.883598 · Cited by 674
Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer
Markman, G. D., Phan, P. H., Balkin, D. B., & Gianiodis, P. T. (2005) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.003 · Cited by 647
The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration
Ponds, R., Van Oort, F., & Frenken, K. (2007) · Papers in Regional Science · doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00126.x · Cited by 645
Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: the proximity paradox
Broekel, T., & Boschma, R. (2012) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/lbr010 · Cited by 587
Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Tijssen, R. J. W. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.012 · Cited by 563
Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries
Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Lockett, A., & Knockaert, M. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.021 · Cited by 557
Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects
Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005 · Cited by 505
Balland, P.-A. (2012) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343404.2010.529121 · Cited by 466
Laursen, K., Reichstein, T., & Salter, A. (2011) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343400903401618 · Cited by 433
When Does University Research Get Commercialized? Creating Ambidexterity in Research Institutions
Ambos, T. C., Mäkelä, K., Birkinshaw, J., & D'Este, P. (2008) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00804.x · Cited by 407
Murray, F. (2010) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/653599 · Cited by 401
D'Este, P., Guy, F., & Iammarino, S. (2013) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/lbs010 · Cited by 390
Conflicting Logics? A Multidimensional View of Industrial and Academic Science
Sauermann, H., & Stephan, P. (2013) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0769 · Cited by 350
R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from French CIS data
Lhuillery, S., & Pfister, E. (2009) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.09.002 · Cited by 344
Incubator firm failure or graduation?
Rothaermel, F. T., & Thursby, M. (2005) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.012 · Cited by 336
Maietta, O. W. (2015) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.03.006 · Cited by 319
Dimensions of Proximity and Knowledge Bases: Innovation between Spatial and Non-spatial Factors
Mattes, J. (2012) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.552493 · Cited by 296
Hong, W., & Su, Y.-S. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.012 · Cited by 280
Autant-Bernard, C., Billand, P., Frachisse, D., & Massard, N. (2007) · Papers in Regional Science · doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00132.x · Cited by 279
Capaldo, A., & Petruzzelli, A. M. (2014) · European Management Review · doi:10.1111/emre.12024 · Cited by 255
University technology transfer offices: The search for identity to build legitimacy
O’Kane, C., Mangematin, V., Geoghegan, W., & Fitzgerald, C. (2015) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.08.003 · Cited by 232
Open data partnerships between firms and universities: The role of boundary organizations
Perkmann, M., & Schildt, H. A. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.006 · Cited by 227
Industry and academia in convergence: Micro-institutional dimensions of R&D collaboration
Bjerregaard, T. (2010) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2009.11.002 · Cited by 222
Technology transfer offices and academic spin-off creation: the case of Italy
Algieri, B., Aquino, A., & Succurro, M. (2011) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-011-9241-8 · Cited by 218
Proximity, networking and knowledge production in Europe: What lessons for innovation policy?
Marrocu, E., Paci, R., & Usaï, S. (2013) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.004 · Cited by 214
Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity
Nooteboom, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V. A., & van den Oord, A. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.903745 · Cited by 200
How does proximity affect interfirm marketing cooperation? A study of an agribusiness cluster
Geldés, C., Felzensztein, C., Turkina, E., & Durand, A. (2014) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.09.034 · Cited by 195
Huber, F. (2012) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.569539 · Cited by 192
Colombo, M. G., & Piva, E. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.010 · Cited by 190
Siegel, D. S., & Phan, P. (2005) · Advances in the study of entrepreneurship, innovation, and economic growth · doi:10.1016/s1048-4736(05)16001-9 · Cited by 176
Kodama, T. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.014 · Cited by 172
Alexander, A. T., & Martin, D. (2012) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.07.013 · Cited by 166
Tartari, V., Salter, A. J., & D’Este, P. (2012) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/cje/bes007 · Cited by 165
Steinmo, M. T., & Rasmussen, E. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.09.006 · Cited by 158
Self-citationProximity, network formation and inventive performance: in search of the proximity paradox
Cassi, L., & Plunket, A. (2014) · The Annals of Regional Science · doi:10.1007/s00168-014-0612-6 · Cited by 125
Jacobsson, S., & Karltorp, K. (2013) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.077 · Cited by 115
Working with distant researchers—Distance and content in university–industry interaction
Broström, A. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.002 · Cited by 106
Huyghe, A., Knockaert, M., Wright, M., & Piva, E. (2013) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-013-9537-1 · Cited by 101
Boardman, C., & Gray, D. O. (2010) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9162-y · Cited by 101
The impact of technology intermediaries on firm cognitive capacity additionality
Knockaert, M., Spithoven, A., & Clarysse, B. (2013) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.007 · Cited by 87
Nosella, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2009) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537320903052657 · Cited by 83
Self-citationDo science parks promote research and technology? A scientometric analysis of the UK
Minguillo, D., Tijssen, R., & Thelwall, M. A. (2014) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1435-z · Cited by 78
Heringa, P. W., Horlings, E., van der Zouwen, M., van den Besselaar, P., & van Vierssen, W. (2014) · Economics of Innovation and New Technology · doi:10.1080/10438599.2014.882139 · Cited by 77
Spatial and Non-spatial Proximities in Inter-firm Relations: An Empirical Analysis
Aguiléra, A., Lethiais, V., & Rallet, A. (2012) · Industry and Innovation · doi:10.1080/13662716.2012.669609 · Cited by 71
Proximity and Innovation through an ‘Accessibility to Knowledge’ Lens
Massard, N., & Méhier, C. (2008) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343400701808881 · Cited by 71
Dornbusch, F., & Neuhäusler, P. (2015) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.04.003 · Cited by 67
On the economic impact of university proof of concept centers
Hayter, C. S., & Link, A. N. (2014) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-014-9369-4 · Cited by 49
Slavtchev, V. (2010) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343404.2010.487058 · Cited by 34
Research excellence and university-industry collaboration in UK science parks
Minguillo, D., & Thelwall, M. (2015) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.1093/reseval/rvu032 · Cited by 30
Cited by
Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems
Malecki, E. J. (2018) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/gec3.12359 · Cited by 784
A review of qualitative case methods trends and themes used in technology transfer research
Cunningham, J. A., Menter, M., & Young, C. (2017) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9491-6 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Villani, E., Rasmussen, E., & Grimaldi, R.
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 114
- Pages
- 86-102
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2439291928
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 42.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.