Cited by 350Smart Cities and TechnologiesInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social DevelopmentUrban Planning and Governance

Towards the smart city 2.0: Empirical evidence of using smartness as a tool for tackling social challenges

Trencher, Gregory·2019·Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.033

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Trencher, G.
Affiliations
Tohoku University (JP)
Corresponding author
Trencher, Gregory
Venue
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
142
Pages
117-128
ISSN
0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2884976736
Cited by
350
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 2
FWCI
16.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Technological Forecasting and Social Change (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18H00919)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
Keywords
social challenges, decentralized governance, cooperative participation, resident needs, endogenous development, Fukushima

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review