The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Servitization and Industry 4.0 convergence in the digital transformation of product firms: A business model innovation perspective
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Servitization and Industry 4.0 are considered two of the most recent trends transforming industrial companies. Servitization is mainly focused on adding value to the customer (demand-pull) while Industry 4.0 is frequently related to adding value to manufacturing process (technology-push). Although some scholars address them as complementary concepts, the literature lacks evidences about what are the interfaces and connection between the two trends. Thus, we aim to develop a conceptual framework that connects Servitization and Industry 4.0 concepts from a business model innovation (BMI) perspective. Our framework is based on three Servitization levels (i.e. smoothing, adapting and substituting) and three levels of digitization (i.e. low, moderate and high levels). We show that matching these levels results in nine possible configurations classified in manual, digital and industry 4.0-related services, which can focus on smoothing, adapting or substituting services. We use reported cases from the literature to support and illustrate these configurations. We also discuss different levels of complexity for the implementation of these configurations. The study hence provides a foundation for the growing research on the interface between Servitization and Industry 4.0.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Technological paradigms and technological trajectories
Dosi, G. (1982) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 · Cited by 6,685
Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.-G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4 · Cited by 4,276
Eight types of product–service system: Eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet
Tukker, A. (2004) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.414 · Cited by 2,456
How ‘big data’ can make big impact: findings from a systematic review and a longitudinal case study
Fosso Wamba, S., Akter, S., Edwards, A., Chopin, G., & Gnanzou, D. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.031 · Cited by 1,905
Babiceanu, R. F., & Seker, R. (2016) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2016.02.004 · Cited by 461
Cortimiglia, M. N., Ghezzi, A., & Frank, A. G. (2016) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12113 · Cited by 194
Self-citation
Cited by
Horváth, D., & Szabó, R. Z. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.021 · Cited by 1,281
Understanding AI adoption in manufacturing and production firms using an integrated TAM-TOE model
Chatterjee, S., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Baabdullah, A. M. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120880 · Cited by 825
Alkaraan, F., Albitar, K., Hussainey, K., & Venkatesh, V. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121423 · Cited by 422
Digital technologies in product-service systems: a literature review and a research agenda
Pirola, F., Boucher, X., Wiesner, S., & Pezzotta, G. (2020) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2020.103301 · Cited by 252
Butt, J. (2020) · Designs · doi:10.3390/designs4030017 · Cited by 247
Alkaraan, F., Elmarzouky, M., Hussainey, K., & Venkatesh, V. G. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122187 · Cited by 247
Favoretto, C., Mendes, G. H. S., Oliveira, M. G., Cauchick-Miguel, P. A., & Coreynen, W. (2022) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.01.003 · Cited by 219
Self-citationDigitalizing procurement: The impact of data analytics on supply chain performance
Hallikas, J., Immonen, M., & Brax, S. (2021) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-05-2020-0201 · Cited by 218
Proposed managerial competencies for Industry 4.0 – Implications for social sustainability
Shet, S. V., & Pereira, V. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121080 · Cited by 205
Industrial internet of things business models in the machine-to-machine context
Leminen, S., Rajahonka, M., Wendelin, R., & Westerlund, M. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.08.008 · Cited by 129
Sui, B., & Yao, L. (2023) · Innovation and Green Development · doi:10.1016/j.igd.2022.100032 · Cited by 104
Context-awareness for the design of Smart-product service systems: Literature review
Carrera-Rivera, A., Larrinaga, F., & Lasa, G. (2022) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2022.103730 · Cited by 97
Of leaders and laggards - Towards digitalization of the process industries
Aaldering, L. J., & Song, C. H. (2021) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102211 · Cited by 66
Jing, H., Zhang, Y., & Ma, J. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21020 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Frank, A. G., Mendes, G. H. S., Ayala, N. F., & Ghezzi, A.
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 141
- Pages
- 341-351
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2911153519
- Cited by
- 1,092
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 144.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
