CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 58Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesAgglomeration and Urban SystemsPrivate Equity and Venture Capital

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Austin, Boston, Silicon Valley, and New York: Case studies in the location choices of entrepreneurs in maintaining the Technopolis

Stephens, Bryan, Butler, John Sibley, Garg, Rajiv, Gibson, David V.·2019·Technological Forecasting and Social Change
DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.030
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.030

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Papers in the review in the ontological realm are typically characterized by studying ecosystems through the lens of established theories, including institutional and evolutionary theories.

    “Papers in our review in this realm are typically characterized by studying ecosystems through the lens of established theories, including institutional (e.g., Stephens et al., 2019) and evolutionary the -ories (e.g., Colombelli et al., 2019) to name the most frequent.”

    From Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program (2022) · cites this paper as Stephens et al., 2019

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Agarwal, 2004, Knowledge transfer through inheritance: spin-out generation, development, and survival, Acad. Manag. J., 47, 501, 10.2307/20159599 · DOI
  2. Alcacer, 2007, Location strategies and knowledge spillovers, Manag. Sci., 53, 760, 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0637 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Allen, 1991, Structure, policy, services, and performance in the business incubator industry, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15, 61, 10.1177/104225879101500207 · DOI
  4. Bearman, 1997, Generalized exchange 1, Am. J. Sociol., 102, 1383, 10.1086/231087 · DOI
  5. Bøllingtoft, 2005, The networked business incubator—leveraging entrepreneurial agency?, J. Bus. Ventur., 20, 265, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.005 · DOI
  6. Boskin, 1974, A conditional logit model of occupational choice, J. Polit. Econ., 389, 10.1086/260198 · DOI
  7. Butler, 2019, Social networks, funding, and regional advantages in technology entrepreneurship: an empirical analysis, Inf. Syst. Res.
  8. Campbell, 2012, Who leaves, where to, and why worry? Employee mobility, entrepreneurship and effects on source firm performance, Strateg. Manag. J., 33, 65, 10.1002/smj.943 · DOI
  9. Colyvas, 2006, Roads to institutionalization: the remaking of boundaries between public and private science, Res. Organ. Behav., 27, 305
  10. Dahl, 2009, The embedded entrepreneur, Eur. Manag. Rev., 6, 172, 10.1057/emr.2009.14 · DOI
  11. Dahl, 2010, The social attachment to place, Social Forces, 89, 633, 10.1353/sof.2010.0078 · DOI
  12. Dahl, 2012, Home sweet home: Entrepreneurs' location choices and the performance of their ventures, Manag. Sci., 58, 1059, 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1476 · DOI
  13. De Meo, 2014, On Facebook, Most Ties are Weak (November 1, 2014), vol. 57, no. 11, 78
  14. Dietrich, 2007, The optimal age to start a revolution, The Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 54, 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01281.x · DOI
  15. Dorfman, 1983, Route 128: the development of a regional high technology economy, Res. Policy, 12, 299, 10.1016/0048-7333(83)90009-4 · DOI
  16. Engel, 2015, Global clusters of innovation: lessons from Silicon Valley, Calif. Manag. Rev., 57, 36, 10.1525/cmr.2015.57.2.36 · DOI
  17. Etzkowitz, 2008, Unity and Diversity in high-tech growth and renewal: learning from Boston and Silicon Valley, Eur. Plan. Stud., 16, 1009, 10.1080/09654310802315385 · DOI
  18. Ferrary, 2009, The role of venture capital firms in Silicon Valley's complex innovation network, Econ. Soc., 38, 326, 10.1080/03085140902786827 · DOI
  19. Gibson, 2013, Sustaining the Technopolis: the case of Austin, Texas, World Technopolis Review, 2, 64, 10.7165/wtr2013.2.2.64 · DOI
  20. Henton, 2013, The dynamics of Silicon Valley: creative destruction and the evolution of the innovation habitat, Soc. Sci. Inf., 52, 539, 10.1177/0539018413497542 · DOI
  21. Hite, 2005, Evolutionary processes and paths of relationally embedded network ties in emerging entrepreneurial firms, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 113, 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00072.x · DOI
  22. Homans, 1964, Bringing Men Back In, Am. Sociol. Rev., 29, 809, 10.2307/2090864 · DOI
  23. Kenney, 1999, Technology, entrepreneurship and path dependence: industrial clustering in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Ind. Corp. Chang., 8, 67, 10.1093/icc/8.1.67 · DOI
  24. Kibler, 2013, Formation of entrepreneurial intentions in a regional context, Entrep Region Dev, 25, 293, 10.1080/08985626.2012.721008 · DOI
  25. Marshall, 1920, Principles of economics: an introductory volume, Macmillan, London, U6
  26. Massey, 1990, Social structure, household strategies, and the cumulative causation of migration, Population index, 3, 10.2307/3644186 · DOI
  27. Merton, 1940, Bureaucratic structure and personality, Social Forces, 18, 560, 10.2307/2570634 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Mian, 1996, Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to tenant firms, Res. Policy, 25, 325, 10.1016/0048-7333(95)00828-4 · DOI
  29. Michaelides, 2011, The effect of local ties, wages, and housing costs on migration decisions, J. Socio-Econ., 40, 132, 10.1016/j.socec.2011.01.010 · DOI
  30. Moore, 1993, Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition, Harv. Bus. Rev., 71, 75
  31. Owen-Smith, 2004, Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: the effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community, Organ. Sci., 15, 5, 10.1287/orsc.1030.0054 · DOI
  32. Parsons, 1956, Suggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of organizations-I, Adm. Sci. Q., 1, 63, 10.2307/2390840 · DOI
  33. Planck, 1949, The meaning and limits of exact science, Science, 110, 319, 10.1126/science.110.2857.319 · DOI
  34. Powell, 2002, The spatial clustering of science and capital: accounting for biotech firm-venture capital relationships, Reg. Stud., 36, 291, 10.1080/00343400220122089 · DOI
  35. Rothwell, 2013, Patenting prosperity: invention and economic performance in the United States and its metropolitan areas, Metropolitan Policy Program at Brookings, 1
  36. Scheiber, 2014, The brutal ageism of tech, New Republic, 23
  37. Scott, 2004, Reflections on a half-century of organizational sociology, Annu. Rev. Sociol., 30, 1, 10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110644 · DOI
  38. Shane, 2004, 50th anniversary article: technological innovation, product development, and entrepreneurship in management science, Manag. Sci., 50, 133, 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0204 · DOI
  39. Sjaastad, 1962, The costs and returns of human migration, J. Polit. Econ., 80, 10.1086/258726 · DOI
  40. Smilor, 1989, Creating the Technopolis: high technology development in Austin, Texas, J. Bus. Ventur., 49, 10.1016/0883-9026(89)90033-5 · DOI
  41. Sorenson, 2003, Social networks and industrial geography, J. Evol. Econ., 13, 513, 10.1007/s00191-003-0165-9 · DOI
  42. Sorenson, 2000, The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989, Am. J. Sociol., 106, 424, 10.1086/316962 · DOI
  43. Totterman, 2005, Start-ups: business incubation and social capital, Int. Small Bus. J., 23, 487, 10.1177/0266242605055909 · DOI
  44. Venkataraman, 2004, Regional transformation through technological entrepreneurship, J. Bus. Ventur., 19, 153, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.04.001 · DOI
  45. White, 2010, Opening up or closing down opportunities?: the role of social networks and attachment to place in informing young peoples' attitudes and access to training and employment, Urban Stud., 48, 41, 10.1177/0042098009360234 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program

    Wurth, B., Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258721998948 · Cited by 789

    “…(Brown et al., 2016 ; Mack & Mayer, 2016 ) and that the state of the ecosystem and previous outputs/outcomes shape individual entrepreneurial behavior and ecosystem development (Auerswald & Dani, 2017 ; Lerner et al., 2018 ; Radinger-Peer et al., 2018; Schillo et al., 2016 ; Stephens et al., 2019).”

Metadata

Authors
Stephens, B., Butler, J. S., Garg, R., & Gibson, D. V.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Stephens, Bryan
ORCID
Venue
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
146
Pages
267-280
ISSN
0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.030
OpenAlex
W2953075001
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
10.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Technological Forecasting and Social Change (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Texas at Austin
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Agglomeration and Urban Systems
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Private Equity and Venture Capital
Keywords
technopolis, entrepreneurial ecosystems, technology clusters, institutional theory, venture capital, innovation and R&D, patents, startup creation, entrepreneur age, Silicon Valley, Austin, Boston, New York City

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review