Cited by 474Delphi Technique in ResearchMulti-Criteria Decision MakingForecasting Techniques and Applications

Improving the practical application of the Delphi method in group-based judgment: a six-step prescription for a well-founded and defensible process

Belton, Ian, MacDonald, Alice, Wright, George, Hamlin, Iain·2019·Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.07.002

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Belton, I., MacDonald, A., Wright, G., & Hamlin, I.
Affiliations
University of Strathclyde (GB)
Corresponding author
Belton, Ian
Venue
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
147
Pages
72-82
ISSN
0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964311550
Cited by
474
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 1
FWCI
60.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Technological Forecasting and Social Change (publishedVersion)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
Keywords
Delphi method, respondent selection, response scales, technology forecasting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review