CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 77

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The coevolution mechanism of stakeholder strategies in the recycled resources industry innovation ecosystem: the view of evolutionary game theory

Hao, Xinyu, Liu, Guangfu, Zhang, Xiaoling, Dong, Liang·2022·Technological Forecasting and Social Change
DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121627
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121627

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. Adner, 2006, Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem, Harv. Bus. Rev., 84, 98
  2. Adner, 2017, Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy, J. Manag., 43, 39
  3. Alam, 2020, Open innovation ecosystems: toward low-cost wind energy startups, Int. J. Energy Sect. Manag., 14, 853, 10.1108/IJESM-07-2019-0010 · DOI
  4. Alvarez-Rodriguez, 2021, Evolutionary dynamics of higher-order interactions in social networks, Nat. Hum. Behav., 5, 586, 10.1038/s41562-020-01024-1 · DOI
  5. Asplund, 2021, The genesis of public-private innovation ecosystems: Bias and challenges, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 162, 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120378 · DOI
  6. Barnes, 1982, Recycling: A problem in reverse logistics, J. Macromarketing, 2, 31, 10.1177/027614678200200204 · DOI
  7. Berglund, 2003, An Econometric analysis of global waste paper recovery and utilization, Environ. Resour. Econ., 26, 429, 10.1023/B:EARE.0000003595.60196.a9 · DOI
  8. Billard, 2019, Green Solvents in urban mining, Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem., 18, 37, 10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.11.013 · DOI
  9. Bokken, 2016, Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy, J. IND. PROD. ENG., 33, 308
  10. Cohen, 2009, Evolutionary game theory and the evolution of neuron populations, ring rates, and decision making, Nat. Prec., 10.1038/npre.2009.3373.1 · DOI
  11. Cohendet, 2021, From business ecosystems to ecosystems of innovation: The case of the video game industry in Montreal, Ind. Innov., 28, 1046, 10.1080/13662716.2020.1793737 · DOI
  12. Coninx, 2018, Who gets my flex? An evolutionary game theory analysis of flexibility market dynamics, Appl. Energy, 218, 104, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.098 · DOI
  13. D'Adamo, 2020, Recycling of end-of-life vehicles: Assessing trends and performances in Europe, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 152, 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119887 · DOI
  14. Dedehayir, 2018, Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 136, 18, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.028 · DOI
  15. de Vasconcelos Gomes, 2021, Managing uncertainty propagation in innovation ecosystems, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 171
  16. Diamant, 2021, A game theoretic approach reveals that discretizing clinical information can reduce antibiotic misuse, Nat. Commun., 12, 10.1038/s41467-021-21088-5 · DOI
  17. Feng, 2021, A systematic review of enterprise innovation ecosystems, Sustainability, 13, 5742, 10.3390/su13105742 · DOI
  18. Gong, 2020, Investigation into circular economy of plastics: The case of the UK fast moving consumer goods industry, J. Clean Prod., 244, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118941 · DOI
  19. Helman, 2020, Analysis of local innovation and entrepreneurial system structure towards the “Wroclaw Innovation Ecosystem” Concept development, Sustainability, 12, 10086, 10.3390/su122310086 · DOI
  20. Huang, 2013, Analysis for strategy of closed-loop supply chain with dual recycling channel, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 144, 510, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.04.002 · DOI
  21. Iyawa, 2017, Identifying essential components of a digital health innovation ecosystem for the Namibian context: Findings from a Delphi study, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries., 82, 1, 10.1002/j.1681-4835.2017.tb00601.x · DOI
  22. Jiang, 2019, Core firm based view on the mechanism of constructing an enterprise innovation ecosystem: A case study of Haier Group, Sustainability, 11, 3108, 10.3390/su11113108 · DOI
  23. Jiang, 2022, Transition and innovation ecosystem–investigating technologies, focal actors, and institution in eHealth innovations, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 175, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121369 · DOI
  24. Jo, 2018, Estimation of potential quantity and value of used and in-use stocks of urban mines in Korea, J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag., 20, 965, 10.1007/s10163-017-0655-8 · DOI
  25. Kang, 2022, China’s changing city-level greenhouse gas emissions from municipal solid waste treatment and driving factors, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 180, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106168 · DOI
  26. Ketonen-Oksi, 2019, Innovation ecosystems as structures for value Co-creation, Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev., 9, 25, 10.22215/timreview/1216 · DOI
  27. Khurana, 2021, From latent to emergent entrepreneurship in innovation ecosystems: The role of entrepreneurial learning, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 167, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120694 · DOI
  28. Könnölä, 2021, Transformative governance of innovation ecosystems, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 173, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121106 · DOI
  29. Li, 2015, Circular economy of a papermaking park in China: a case study, J. Clean Prod., 92, 65, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.098 · DOI
  30. Li, 2021, Synergic optimization of pollution prevention and resource recovery of secondary lead smelting industry based on two-stage BPNLP network model, J. Clean Prod., 284, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124717 · DOI
  31. Liu, 2022, Recycled WEEE plastics in China: Generation trend and environmental impacts, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 177, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105978 · DOI
  32. Lyapunov, 1992, The general problem of the stability of motion, Int. J. Control., 55, 531, 10.1080/00207179208934253 · DOI
  33. Mailath, 1992, Introduction: Symposium on evolutionary game theory, J. Econ. Theory., 57, 259, 10.1016/0022-0531(92)90036-H · DOI
  34. Marcon, 2021, How do startups manage external resources in innovation ecosystems? A resource perspective of startups’ lifecycle, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 171, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120965 · DOI
  35. Mo, 2009, China's recyclable resources recycling system and policy: A case study in Suzhou, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 53, 409, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.03.002 · DOI
  36. Mohammed, 2017, Multi-period planning of closed-up supply chain with carbon policies under uncertainty, Transport. Res. Part D-Transport. Environ., 51, 146, 10.1016/j.trd.2016.10.033 · DOI
  37. Palmié, 2022, The evolution of the digital service ecosystem and digital business model innovation in retail: The emergence of meta-ecosystems and the value of physical interactions, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 177, 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121496 · DOI
  38. Pappu, 2007, Solid wastes generation in India and their recycling potential in building materials, Build. Environ., 42, 2311, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.04.015 · DOI
  39. Ritzberger, 1995, Evolutionary selection in normal-form games, Econometrica, 63, 1371, 10.2307/2171774 · DOI
  40. Rush, 2021, Applying an ecosystems approach to humanitarian innovation, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 165, 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120529 · DOI
  41. Sampat, 2021, Valuing economic impact reductions of nutrient pollution from livestock waste, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 164, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105199 · DOI
  42. Sant, 2020, The structure of an innovation ecosystem: Foundation for future research, Manag. Decis., 58, 2725, 10.1108/MD-03-2019-0383 · DOI
  43. Schmid, 2021, A unified framework of direct and indirect reciprocity, Nat. Hum. Behav., 5, 1292, 10.1038/s41562-021-01114-8 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Schroth, 2018, Collaboration Strategies in innovation ecosystems: An empirical study of the German Microelectronics and Photonics industries, Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev., 8, 4, 10.22215/timreview/1195 · DOI
  45. Shekdar, 2009, Sustainable solid waste management: An integrated approach for Asian countries, Waste Manage, 29, 1438, 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.08.025 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Smith, 1973, The logic of Animal Conflict, Nature, 246, 15, 10.1038/246015a0 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Suominen, 2018, A bibliometric review on innovation systems and ecosystems: A research agenda, Eur. J. Innov. Manag., 22, 335, 10.1108/EJIM-12-2017-0188 · DOI
  48. Tian, 2021, Culture and innovation in the international context: a literature overview, Innovation, 34, 426
  49. Tilman, 2020, Evolutionary games with environmental feedbacks, Nat. Commun., 11, 915, 10.1038/s41467-020-14531-6 · DOI
  50. Wang, 2019, How do policies take effect in the development of the urban mining industry? A local capability perspective: Evidence from Miluo, China (2000-2017), J. Clean Prod., 240, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118216 · DOI
  51. Wang, 2018, “Internet+” recyclable resources: a new recycling mode in China, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 134, 44, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.03.006 · DOI
  52. Wang, 2019, A scientometric review of resource recycling industry, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16, 4654, 10.3390/ijerph16234654 · DOI
  53. Wu, 2019, A potential game approach to modelling evolution in a connected society, Nat. Hum. Behav., 3, 604, 10.1038/s41562-019-0571-0 · DOI
  54. Xu, 2018, Exploring innovation ecosystems across science, technology, and business: A case of 3D printing in China, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 136, 208, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.030 · DOI
  55. Xu, 2021, Which financial earmarking policy is more effective in promoting FinTech innovation and regulation?, Ind. Manage. Data Syst., 121, 2181, 10.1108/IMDS-11-2020-0656 · DOI
  56. Xue, 2017, Location optimization of urban mining facilities with maximal covering model in GIS, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 913, 10.1111/jiec.12467 · DOI
  57. Yang, 2012, Recycling of composite materials, Chem. Eng. Process., 51, 53, 10.1016/j.cep.2011.09.007 · DOI
  58. Yang, 2021, How does alliance-based government-university-industry foster cleantech innovation in a green innovation ecosystem?, J. Clean Prod., 283, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124559 · DOI
  59. Yao, 2018, A bibliometric study of China's resource recycling industry policies:1978-2016, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 134, 80, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.03.008 · DOI
  60. Yoda, 2014, Building application of recycled aggregate concrete for upper-ground structural elements, Constr. Build. Mater., 67, 379, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.096 · DOI
  61. Yu, 2021, Impact of demand information sharing on organic farming adoption: An evolutionary game approach, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 172, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121001 · DOI
  62. Yuan, 2021, How to Restrain Regulatory Capture and Promote Green Innovation in China. An Analysis Based on Evolutionary Game Theory, Sustainability., 13, 9752, 10.3390/su13179752 · DOI
  63. Zan, 2019, University–Industry Collaborative Innovation Evolutionary Game and Simulation Research: The Agent Coupling and Group Size View, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 68, 1406, 10.1109/TEM.2019.2908206 · DOI
  64. Zeng, 2016, Uncovering the recycling potential of “New, WEEE in China. Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 1347, 10.1021/acs.est.5b05446 · DOI
  65. Zhao, 2021, Dynamic analysis of different resource allocations: Implications for resource orchestration management of strategic alliances, Comput. Ind. Eng., 158, 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107393 · DOI
  66. Zomorrodi, 2017, Genome-driven evolutionary game theory helps understand the rise of metabolic interdependencies in microbial communities, Nat. Commun., 8, 1563, 10.1038/s41467-017-01407-5 · DOI
  67. Zuo, 2019, Strategic evaluation of recycling high-tech metals from urban mines in China: An emerging industry perspective, J. Clean Prod., 208, 697, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.030 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hao, X., Liu, G., Zhang, X., & Dong, L.
Venue
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
179
Pages
121627
ISSN
0040-1625
DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121627
Cited by
77
References
5
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review