Cited by 77E-Government and Public ServicesPublic Policy and Administration ResearchPublic Administration and Political Analysis

The digital governance puzzle: Towards integrative theory of humans, machines, and organizations in public management

Vigoda-Gadot, Eran, Mizrahi, Shlomo·2024·Technology in Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102530

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Mizrahi, S.
Affiliations
University of Haifa (IL)
Venue
Technology in Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-06
Volume
77
Pages
102530
ISSN
0160-791X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4393238597
Cited by
59
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 8
FWCI
94.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Technology in Society (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
Keywords
digital governance, digital transformation, public administration, public organization performance, citizen-government interaction, Fourth Industrial Revolution, integrative theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review