Cited by 77E-Government and Public ServicesInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social DevelopmentPublic Policy and Administration Research

Digital platforms for the co-creation of public value

Open access
Meijer, Albert, Boon, Wouter·2021·Policy & Politics

Abstract

This article provides a theoretical understanding of the potential contribution of digital platforms to the co-creation of public value. On the basis of insights from different academic disciplines, a layered model is developed for the relations between technology, governance, users and societal outcomes. The theoretical model proposes that these layers can result in basic configurations – consistent combinations of the four elements – but also hybrid configurations. We identify three basic configurations: (1) a closed platform controlled by a private sector organisation, (2) an open platform controlled by a government organisation and (3) an open platform run by a civil society organisation. The configurations are illustrated with examples of digital platforms from all over the world. The configurational understanding of digital platforms for the co-creation of public value provides the basis for a systematic analysis of these rapidly growing practices in countries around the world.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1332/030557321x16115951032181

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Meijer, A., & Boon, W.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
Policy & Politics
Published
2021-04
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
231-248
ISSN
  • 0305-5736 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-8442
OpenAlex
W3135905753
Cited by
77
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4
FWCI
39.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Policy & Politics (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Keywords
digital platforms, platform governance, open platform, layered model, hybrid configuration, social outcomes, technology and governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review