Cited by 10Smart Grid Energy ManagementElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureOptimal Power Flow Distribution

A multi-agent deep reinforcement learning based energy management for behind-the-meter resources

Open access
Wilk, Patrick, Wang, Ning, Li, Jie·2022·The Electricity Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tej.2022.107129

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilk, P., Wang, N., & Li, J.
Affiliations
Rowan University (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Jie
Venue
The Electricity Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
107129
ISSN
1040-6190 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4229378486
Cited by
9
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The Electricity Journal (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
Keywords
multi-agent deep reinforcement learning, energy management, electric vehicles, smart buildings, distributed renewable energy, distributed energy management, electric vehicle charging, demand management, community energy systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review