Cited by 92Educational Games and GamificationDigital Games and MediaDigital Marketing and Social Media

Gamification for value creation and viewer engagement in gamified livestreaming services: The moderating role of gender in esports

Open access
Qian, Tyreal Yizhou, Matz, Robbie, Luo, Lei, Xu, Chenglong·2022·Journal of Business Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.082

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qian, T. Y., Matz, R., Luo, L., & Xu, C.
Affiliations
  • Louisiana State University (US)
  • Belmont University (US)
  • Shanghai University of Sport (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Qian, Tyreal Yizhou
  • Luo, Lei
  • Xu, Chenglong
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
145
Pages
482-494
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220956623
Cited by
92
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 6
FWCI
30.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
gamification, esports, live streaming, viewer engagement, perceived value, gender differences, functional value, social values, value creation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review