Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 28Generational Differences and TrendsLearning Styles and Cognitive DifferencesInnovations in Medical Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A scoping review of gen z nursing students: learning preferences and educator strategies

Dodson, Tracy M., Thompson-Hairston, Kimberley·2025·Teaching and Learning in Nursing
DOI 10.1016/j.teln.2024.11.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.teln.2024.11.007

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hampton, 2016, Generation z students: will they change our nursing classroom, Journal of Nursing Education, 7
  2. Pearson. (2018). What do Generation Z and millennials expect from technology in education?https://www.pearson.com/en-us/higher-education/insights-and-events/teaching-and-learning-blog/2018/05/generation-z-millennials-expect-technology-education.html

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Dodson, T. M., & Thompson-Hairston, K.
Affiliations
Kent State University (US)
Corresponding author
Dodson, Tracy M.
ORCID
Venue
Teaching and Learning in Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
85-90
ISSN
  • 1557-2013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3087
DOI
10.1016/j.teln.2024.11.007
OpenAlex
W4404883104
Cited by
24
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 8
FWCI
16.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations
Teaching and learning in nursing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Generational Differences and Trends
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
Generation Z, nursing students, learning styles, nursing education, teaching methods, gamification, digital storytelling, video-based teaching, interactive learning, student engagement, artificial intelligence in education, online and blended learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.