Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 431Work-Family Balance ChallengesEmployee Performance and ManagementLabor Law and Work Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanisms to improve labor productivity by performing telework.

Kazekami, Sachiko·2020·Telecommunications Policy
DOI 10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101868
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates mechanisms underlying the influence of telework on labor productivity in Japan. First, this study finds that appropriate telework hours increase labor productivity, but when telework hours are too long, telework decreases labor productivity. Second, telework increases life satisfaction, and life satisfaction improves labor productivity. However, telework increases the stress of balancing work and domestic chores, contrary to Japanese governmental expectations, and the stress decreases life satisfaction. The stress, fortunately, does not directly reduce labor productivity. Although telework increases happiness and work satisfaction, these factors do not influence labor productivity. Third, this study clarifies that telework is more efficient for improving labor productivity if workers commute more than 1 h or commute by trains or buses that are usually very crowded during rush hours in Japan. Finally, the effect of telework for workers who have a greater number of potential trivial duties is insignificantly larger. Supervisors and colleagues often ask others to perform trivial, extra tasks without regard for schedules. Telework may help workers avoid such trivial duties and increase labor productivity. However, the importance of trivial duties is also demonstrated in this study.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101868

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ishak, 2005, Promoting employees' innovativeness and organisational citizenship behaviour through superior-subordinate relationship in the workplace, Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 13, 16

Cited by

Items 301–400 of 431

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kazekami, S.
Affiliations
Keio University (JP)
Corresponding author
Kazekami, Sachiko
ORCID
Kazekami, Sachiko
Venue
Telecommunications Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
101868
ISSN
0308-5961 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101868
OpenAlex
W2972104792
Cited by
375
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 20
FWCI
77.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Telecommunications Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Law › Labor Law and Work Dynamics
Keywords
remote work, labor productivity, life satisfaction, job satisfaction, happiness, commuting time, commuting modes, Japanese workers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.