The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship
Open accessAbstract
Contemporary theories of entrepreneurship generally focus on the recognition of opportunities and the decision to exploit them. Although the entrepreneurship literature treats opportunities as exogenous, the prevailing theory of economic growth suggests they are endogenous. This paper advances the microeconomic foundations of endogenous growth theory by developing a knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Knowledge created endogenously results in knowledge spillovers, which allow entrepreneurs to identify and exploit opportunities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A contribution to the theory of economic growth
Solow, R. M. (1956) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1884513 · Cited by 24,483
On the mechanics of economic development
Lucas, R. E. (1988) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7 · Cited by 24,085
Endogenous Technological Change
Romer, P. M. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261725 · Cited by 17,711
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2233763 · Cited by 7,530
“A Model of Growth: Through Creative Destruction”
Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2951599 · Cited by 7,529
Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy
Barney, J. B. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231 · Cited by 5,548
On the Size Distribution of Business Firms
Lucas, R. E. (1978) · The Bell Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/3003596 · Cited by 3,236
Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks
Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.7.905 · Cited by 2,565
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1994b). R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 336–340. · DOI
- Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. The American Economic Review, 78, 678–690.
- Anton, J. J., & Yao, D. A. (1994). Expropriation and inventions: Appropriable rents in the absence of property rights. The American Economic Review, 84, 190–209.
- Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity. NJ: Princeton University Press and NBER.
- Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation and industry evolution. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
- Baumol, W. J. (2004). Entrepreneurial enterprises, large established firms and other components of the free-market growth machine. Small Business Economics, 23, 9–21. · DOI
- Bhide, A. (1994). How entrepreneurs craft strategies that work. Harvard Business Review, 72, 150–161.
- Blau, D. M. (1987). A time-series analysis of self-employment in the United States. The Journal of Political Economy, 95, 445–467. · DOI
- Braunerhjelm, P., & Svensson, R. (2008). The inventor’s role: Was Schumpeter right? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, forthcoming. · DOI
- Carlsson, B., & Fridh, A.-C. (2002). Technology transfer in United States universities: A survey and statistical analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12, 199–232. · DOI
- Dinopoulos, E. (1996). Schumpeterian growth theory: An overview. In E. Helmstädter & M. Perlman (Eds.), Behavioral norms, technological progress and economic dynamics. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
- Gancia, G., & Zilibotti, F. (2005). Horizontal innovation in the theory of growth and development. In P. Aghion & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth. North Holland, Amsterdam: New York Elsevier.
- Giuri, P., Mariani, M., Brusoni, S., Crespi, G., Francoz, D., Gambardella, A., et al. (2007). Inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey. Research Policy, 36, 1107–1127. · DOI · Paper page
- Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 92–116. · DOI · Paper page
- Griliches, Z. (1986). Productivity, R&D, and basic research at the firm level in the 1970s. The American Economic Review, 76, 141–154.
- Hébert, R. F., & Albert, N. (1982). The entrepreneur: Mainstream views and radical critiques. New York: Praeger.
- Hellmann, T. (2007). When do employees become entrepreneurs? Management Science, 53, 919–933. · DOI · Paper page
- Henrekson, M. (2005). Entrepreneurship: A weak link in the welfare state? Industrial and Corporate Change, 14, 437–467. · DOI · Paper page
- Howitt, P. (1999). Steady endogenous growth with population and R&D inputs growing. Journal of Political Economy, 107, 715. · DOI · Paper page
- Hvide, H. K. (2006). Firm size and the quality of entrepreneurs. Economic Journal, in press.
- Intriligator, M. D. (1971). Mathematical optimization and economic theory. NJ: Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs.
- Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. NY, USA: Random House.
- Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 577–598. · DOI · Paper page
- Jones, C. I. (1995). R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 759–784. · DOI · Paper page
- Jorgenson, D. W. (2001). Information technology and the US economy. The American Economic Review, 91, 1–32. · DOI · Paper page
- Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Entrepreneurship and competition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Klapper, L., Amit, R., Guillén, M. F., & Quesada, J. M. (2007). Entrepreneurship and firm formation across countries. Development Research Group Working Paper. Washington DC: World Bank. · DOI · Paper page
- Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. The Journal of Political Economy, 99, 483–499. · DOI · Paper page
- Lazear, E. P. (2005). Entrepreneurship. Journal of Labor Economics, 23, 649–680. · DOI · Paper page
- Michelacci, C. (2003). Low returns in R&D due to the lack of entrepreneurial skills. The Economic Journal, 113, 207–225. · DOI
- Moen, J. (2005). Is mobility of technical personnel a source of R&D spillovers? Journal of Labor Economics, 23, 81–114. · DOI · Paper page
- Nicoletti, G., Scarpetta, S., & Boylaud, O. (2000). Summary indicators of product market regulation with an extension to employment protection legislation. Concepts and measurement of labour markets flexibility/adaptability indicators. Paris: OECD Economics Department. · DOI
- Pakes, A., & Nitzan, S. (1983). Optimum contracts for research personnel, research employment, and the establishment of “Rival” Enterprises. Journal of Labor Economics, 1, 345–365. · DOI
- Parker, S. C. (2004). The economics of self-employment and entrepreneurship. New York: Cambridge University Press. · DOI · Paper page
- Romer, P. M. (1996). Why, indeed, in America? Theory, history, and the origins of modern economic growth. The American Economic Review, 86, 202–206.
- Scherer, F. M. (1965). Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions. The American Economic Review, 55, 1097–1125.
- Schumpeter, J. (1911 [1934]). The theory of economic development, New York: Oxford University Press.
- Segerstrom, P. S., Anant, T. C. A., & Dinopoulos, E. (1990). A Schumpeterian model of the product life cycle. The American Economic Review, 80, 1077–1091.
- Shackle, G. L. S. (1982). Foreword. In R. F. Hebert & A. Link (Eds.), The entrepreneur: Mainstream views and radical critiques. New York: Praeger Publishers.
- Shane, S. (2001). Technological opportunities and new firm creation. Management Science, 47, 205–220. · DOI · Paper page
- Thompson, P., & Fox-Kean, M. (2005). Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: A reassessment. American Economic Review, 95, 450–460. · DOI · Paper page
- von Hayek, F. A. (1937). Economics and knowledge. Economica, 4, 33–54. · DOI · Paper page
- Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Brewer, M. B. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of us biotechnology enterprises. The American Economic Review, 88, 290–306.
Cited by
Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems
Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D. W., & Wright, M. (2018) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1266 · Cited by 1,738
National systems of entrepreneurship: measurement issues and policy implications
Ács, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016 · Cited by 1,301
Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions
Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2017) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8 · Cited by 977
Self-citationToward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program
Wurth, B., Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258721998948 · Cited by 789
Infrastructure and entrepreneurship
Audretsch, D. B., Heger, D., & Veith, T. (2015) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-014-9600-6 · Cited by 451
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B.
- Venue
- Small Business Economics
- Published
- 2008-12-13
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-30
- ISSN
- 0921-898X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0913
- OpenAlex
- W3124839039
- Cited by
- 1,834
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 98.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3
- The paper
- Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.