Cited by 78Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIDigitalization, Law, and Regulation

Barriers and pitfalls for artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: Ethical and regulatory issues

Open access
Ahmad, Omer F., Stoyanov, Danail, Lovat, Laurence B.·2020·Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tgie.2019.150636

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmad, O. F., Stoyanov, D., & Lovat, L. B.
Affiliations
Wellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (GB)
Corresponding author
Ahmad, Omer F.
Venue
Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
80-84
ISSN
2590-0307 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2980098811
Cited by
78
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2022-01-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  • Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Keywords
artificial intelligence, gastroenterology, endoscopy, AI ethics, regulatory pathways, data privacy, data sharing, patient harm, accountability, algorithmic bias, workforce impact, patient safety, clinical implementation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review