Cited by 35Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsVasculitis and related conditions

From antibody to clinical phenotype, the black box of the antiphospholipid syndrome: Pathogenic mechanisms of the antiphospholipid syndrome

Du, Vivian X., Kelchtermans, Hilde, de Groot, Philip G., de Laat, Bas·2013·Thrombosis Research

Abstract

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is diagnosed by the combination of vascular thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity and the detection of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) in plasma. In the last few years, a great effort has been made to unravel the mechanism by which aPLs cause thrombosis and a vast amount of mechanisms have been proposed. aPLs were proposed to induce a prothrombotic state by influencing the cellular blood compartment, the plasma compartment, the vascular wall and even metabolic pathways beyond the hemostatic system. However, due to the diversity in the mechanisms and the differences in the methodology, the focus of the mechanistical studies in this field seems to be largely diffused. It is hard to imagine that aPLs can exert such a diversity of effects, resulting in either thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity and the relationship between aPLs and the clinical manifestations remains to be a mysterious "black box". In an attempt to get insight in what takes place inside the black box, we have analyzed 126 mechanistical studies on aPLs and discussed differences in the type of antibodies that were used, the involvement of beta2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI), and the criteria used to diagnose APS patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.07.023

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vitro, interference by aPL autoantibodies with the clotting cascade is reflected in prolongation of phospholipid-dependent clotting assays, such as the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT).

    “In vitro, the interference by these autoantibodies with the clotting cascade is reflected in the prolongation of phospholipid-dependent clotting assays, such as the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) [2].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Du, V. X., Kelchtermans, H., de Groot, P. G., & de Laat, B.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
Corresponding author
Kelchtermans, Hilde
Venue
Thrombosis Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
132
Issue
3
Pages
319-326
ISSN
0049-3848 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976928839
Cited by
35
References
87
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Thrombosis Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vasculitis and related conditions
Keywords
antiphospholipid syndrome, antiphospholipid antibodies, pathophysiological mechanisms, thrombosis, pregnancy morbidity, beta2-glycoprotein I, hypercoagulability, vascular thrombosis, clinical phenotype
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Humans, Phenotype, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Thrombosis, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Antibodies, Antiphospholipid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review