Cited by 27Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchVasculitis and related conditionsBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms

The clinical relevance of the IgM isotype of antiphospholipid antibodies in the vascular antiphospholipid syndrome

Del Ross, Teresa, Ruffatti, Amelia, Cuffaro, Serena, Tonello, Marta, Calligaro, Antonia, Favaro, Maria, Facchinetti, Myriam, Hoxha, Ariela +1 more·2015·Thrombosis Research

Abstract

Objectives Because it has been suggested that the IgM isotype of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies should no longer be included in the laboratory criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification, we assess the clinical relevance of IgM isotype of aPL in a cohort of patients with vascular APS. Patients/methods Mean age, sex, the presence of autoimmune diseases other than systemic lupus erythematosus, risk factors for thrombosis, the type/s and site/s of thromboembolic events, the levels of C3 and C4, and autoantibody profile were evaluated in a large cohort of persistently aPL positive patients fulfilling the Sydney criteria for APS. Patients with isolated IgM isotype were compared for each variable with those with any other aPL antibody combination. Results One hundred six patients were assessed; of these 55 (51.9%) had venous thromboembolism, 48 (45.3%) arterial thrombosis, and 3 (2.8%) small vessel thrombosis. Positivity to only IgM aPL made possible to classify 13 patients (12.3%) as vascular APS. In all cases the presence of IgM aPL was at medium-high titer, confirmed, and found to be stable in the time. There were four patients with retinal thrombosis (3.8%) and the prevalence of this event was significant in the isolated IgM isotype positive patients (p=0.005). Conclusions Data from this investigation give clinical value to the IgM isotype of aPL and suggest to consider aCL and anti-β2GPI of IgM class as valid laboratory criteria for APS classification, espec…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.08.019

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Del Ross, T., Ruffatti, A., Cuffaro, S., Tonello, M., Calligaro, A., Favaro, M., Facchinetti, M., Hoxha, A., & Punzi, L.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Venue
Thrombosis Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
136
Issue
5
Pages
883-886
ISSN
0049-3848 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1750933267
Cited by
27
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Thrombosis Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Università degli Studi di Padova
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vasculitis and related conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Keywords
antiphospholipid antibodies, IgM isotype, anticardiolipin antibodies, retinal thrombosis, venous thromboembolism, arterial thrombosis, thrombosis risk factors, complement levels, autoantibody profile
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin M, Male, Middle Aged, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Antibodies, Antiphospholipid, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review