Cited by 653D Printing in Biomedical ResearchTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications

A 3D toolbox to enhance physiological relevance of human tissue models

Open access
Picollet-D’hahan, Nathalie, Dolega, Monika E., Liguori, Lavinia, Marquette, Christophe, Le Gac, Séverine, Gidrol, Xavier, Martin, Donald K.·2016·Trends in Biotechnology

Abstract

We discuss the current challenges and future prospects of flow-based organoid models and 3D self-assembling scaffolds. The existing paradigm of 3D culture suffers from a lack of control over organoid size and shape; can be an obstacle for cell harvesting and extended cellular and molecular analysis; and does not provide access to the function of exocrine glands. Moreover, existing organ-on-chip models are mostly composed of 2D extracellular matrix (ECM)-coated elastomeric membranes that do not mimic real organ architectures. A new comprehensive 3D toolbox for cell biology has emerged to address some of these issues. Advances in microfabrication and cell-culturing approaches enable the engineering of sophisticated models that mimic organ 3D architectures and physiological conditions, while supporting flow-based drug screening and secretomics-based diagnosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.06.012

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These studies were performed on incomplete 3D models, cell aggregates such as MCTS or dissociated organoids devoid of any exogenous ECM.

    “However, these studies were performed on incomplete 3D models, cell aggregates such as MCTS or dissociated organoids devoid of any exogenous ECM (40).”

    From Direct transfection of clonal organoids in Matrigel microbeads: a promising approach toward organoid-based genetic screens (2018) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Microfabrication section says hanging-drop microtissues form by artificial cell aggregation and usually lack matrices; the 3D Toolbox to Create Artificial Scaffolded Organs section also describes gel-free spheroid models. The paper does not establish that the particular studies referred to used those models, or that they used dissociated organoids devoid of exogenous ECM. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Huh, D. et al. (2007) Acoustically detectable cellular-level lung injury induced by fluid mechanical stresses in microfluidic airway systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 18886-18891
  2. Mallis, P. et al. (2014) Evaluation of decellularization in umbilical cord artery. Transplant. Proc. 46, 3232-3239
  3. Nichols, J.E. et al. (2016) Giving new life to old lungs: methods to produce and assess whole human paediatric bioengineered lungs. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/term.2113 · DOI
  4. Rivron, N.C. et al. (2012) Tissue deformation spatially modulates VEGF signaling and angiogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 6886-6891
  5. Martin, D.K. (ed.) (2007) Nanobiotechnology of Biomimetic Mem- branes, Springer, NY (ISBN 978-0-387-37738-4)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Picollet-D’hahan, N., Dolega, M. E., Liguori, L., Marquette, C., Le Gac, S., Gidrol, X., & Martin, D. K.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Gidrol, Xavier
  • Martin, Donald K.
Venue
Trends in Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
34
Issue
9
Pages
757-769
ISSN
0167-7799 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2506149650
Cited by
65
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-NANB-0002, ANR-11-BSV5-0009)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Keywords
3D tissue models, organoids, organ-on-a-chip, microfabrication, extracellular matrix, organ architecture, exocrine glands, secretomics, drug screening, cell harvesting
MeSH terms
Cells, Cultured, Extracellular Matrix, Humans, Models, Biological, Organoids, Cell Culture Techniques, Tissue Engineering, Microfluidic Analytical Techniques, Tissue Array Analysis, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review