Cited by 74Psychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentEthics in Business and EducationNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Moral Perception

Gantman, Ana P., Van Bavel, Jay J.·2015·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Based on emerging research, we propose that human perception is preferentially attuned to moral content. We describe how moral concerns enhance detection of morally relevant stimuli, and both command and direct attention. These perceptual processes, in turn, have important consequences for moral judgment and behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.004

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gantman, A. P., & Van Bavel, J. J.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Gantman, Ana P.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
631-633
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4243977351
Cited by
74
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
moral perception, moral content, attentional bias, attentional capture, moral judgment, moral behavior, moral concern, stimulus detection
MeSH terms
Humans, Morals, Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review