Cited by 484Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentLanguage and cultural evolutionSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Imitation and Innovation: The Dual Engines of Cultural Learning

Legare, Cristine H., Nielsen, Mark·2015·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Imitation and innovation work in tandem to support cultural learning in children and facilitate our capacity for cumulative culture. Here we propose an integrated theoretical account of how the unique demands of acquiring instrumental skills and cultural conventions provide insight into when children imitate, when they innovate, and to what degree. For instrumental learning, with an increase in experience, high fidelity imitation decreases and innovation increases. By contrast, for conventional learning, imitative fidelity stays high, regardless of experience, and innovation stays low. We synthesize cutting edge research on the development of imitative flexibility and innovation to provide insight into the social learning mechanisms underpinning the uniquely human mind.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.005

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Accumulated learning over generations enables the ratchet effect, making cumulative cultural innovations possible.

    “The accumulated learning over generations enables the ratchet effect, which makes it possible for humans to develop cumulative cultural innovations in complex toolkits, technologies and social systems that could never be invented by a single human without some degree of socialisation into the system (Legare and Nielsen 2015; Tennie et al. 2009; Mesoudi and Thornton 2018).”

    From Cultural Evolution of Religion, Spirituality and Ritual: Impacts On Human Cooperation (2024) · cites this paper as Legare and Nielsen 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Legare, C. H., & Nielsen, M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Legare, Cristine H.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
688-699
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1873606094
Cited by
484
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • ESRC (Economic and Social Research Council) (REF RES-060-25-0085)
  • Australian Research Council Discovery Project (DP140101410)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
imitation, innovation, cultural learning, cumulative culture, operant conditioning, conventional learning, social learning, child development, skill acquisition, cultural norms
MeSH terms
Creativity, Culture, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review