Cited by 25Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesEmbodied and Extended Cognition

Stressful Events as Teaching Signals for the Brain

Trapp, Sabrina, O’Doherty, John P., Schwabe, Lars·2018·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Stressful events are better remembered than mundane events. We explain this advantage by reconceptualizing stress in terms of cumulative prediction errors (PEs) that promote rapid learning of events. This proposal integrates the effects of stress on perception and memory, and provides exciting new perspectives for research on stress and cognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2018.03.007

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trapp, S., O’Doherty, J. P., & Schwabe, L.
Affiliations
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Schwabe, Lars
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
475-478
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2797798721
Cited by
25
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
stress, memory, prediction error, stress and cognition, perception, memory consolidation
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, Learning, Models, Neurological, Models, Psychological, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review