Cited by 653Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeural dynamics and brain function

Dopamine signals for reward value and risk: basic and recent data

Open access
Schultz, Wolfram·2010·Behavioral and Brain Functions

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous lesion, electrical self-stimulation and drug addiction studies suggest that the midbrain dopamine systems are parts of the reward system of the brain. This review provides an updated overview about the basic signals of dopamine neurons to environmental stimuli. METHODS: The described experiments used standard behavioral and neurophysiological methods to record the activity of single dopamine neurons in awake monkeys during specific behavioral tasks. RESULTS: Dopamine neurons show phasic activations to external stimuli. The signal reflects reward, physical salience, risk and punishment, in descending order of fractions of responding neurons. Expected reward value is a key decision variable for economic choices. The reward response codes reward value, probability and their summed product, expected value. The neurons code reward value as it differs from prediction, thus fulfilling the basic requirement for a bidirectional prediction error teaching signal postulated by learning theory. This response is scaled in units of standard deviation. By contrast, relatively few dopamine neurons show the phasic activation following punishers and conditioned aversive stimuli, suggesting a lack of relationship of the reward response to general attention and arousal. Large proportions of dopamine neurons are also activated by intense, physically salient stimuli. This response is enhanced when the stimuli are novel; it appears to be distinct from the reward value signal. Dopamine neurons show also unspecific activations to non-rewarding stimuli that are possibly due to generalization by similar stimuli and pseudoconditioning by primary rewards. These activations are shorter than reward responses and are often followed by depression of activity. A separate, slower dopamine signal informs about risk, another important decision variable. The prediction error response occurs only with reward; it is scaled by the risk of predicted reward. CONCLUSIONS: Neurophysiological studies reveal phasic dopamine signals that transmit information related predominantly but not exclusively to reward. Although not being entirely homogeneous, the dopamine signal is more restricted and stereotyped than neuronal activity in most other brain structures involved in goal directed behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1744-9081-6-24

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The role of dopaminergic neurotransmission in the response to unpredicted or alerting sensory events is less well characterized.

    “Less well characterized is the role of dopaminergic neurotransmission in the response to unpredicted or alerting sensory events, which may encourage investigation or prime motivated behavioral responses to these stimuli (Horvitz, 2000; Bromberg-Martin et al., 2010a; Schultz, 2010).”
  • While expectation of reward has received particular attention as a trigger for a dopamine response, other related cognitive-affective states are supported as well.

    “While the expectation of reward has received particular attention as a trigger for a dopamine response (Schultz, 2013), other related cognitive-affective states are supported as well (Schultz, 2010).”
  • Occasional risks to expected rewards (challenge) can transiently dampen extant levels of reward-related dopamine but amplify the impact of subsequent positive (but not negative) cues, strengthening the learning effect.

    “Occasional risks to expected rewards (i.e., challenge) can transiently dampen the extant levels of rewardrelated dopamine but amplify the impact of subsequent Fig. 3 Schematic of the OPTIMAL theory positive (but not negative) cues, strengthening the learning effect (Schultz, 2010(Schultz, , 2013)).”
  • The DAergic system, particularly the mesocorticolimbic pathway, is involved in drug addiction because DA modulates limbic and cortical sites for goal-directed behavior.

    “The role of the DAergic system (in particular the mesocorticolimbic pathway) in drug addiction derives from DA’s ability to modulate many of the limbic and cortical sites involved in goal-directed behavior (Fig. 1) [18, 28–31].”

    From Mechanistic insights into nicotine withdrawal (2011) · cites this paper as [31]

  • Once conditioning has occurred, DA signals act as a predictor of reward, incentivizing the animal to perform the behaviour that will result in consuming the expected reward.

    “once conditioning has occurred, DA signals act as a predictor of reward (49), incentivizing the animal to perform the behaviour that will result in consuming the expected reward (drug or food).”

    From Obesity and addiction: Neurobiological overlaps (2013) · cites this paper as [49]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schultz, W.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Schultz, Wolfram
Venue
Behavioral and Brain Functions
Published
2010
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
24
ISSN
1744-9081 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156581621
Cited by
653
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 74
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Behavioral and Brain Functions (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Wellcome Trust (095495)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
dopaminergic neurons, reward value, risk, prediction error, midbrain dopamine system, punishment, novelty, economic decision-making, expected value, single-unit recording
MeSH terms
Animals, Haplorhini, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning, Psychological, Dopamine, Neurons, Reward, Risk-Taking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review