Cited by 47Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyCognitive Functions and Memory

Externalizing autobiographical memories in the digital age

Eliseev, Emmaline Drew, Marsh, Elizabeth J.·2021·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

People externalize their autobiographical memories by creating representations that exist outside of their minds. Externalizations often serve personal and social functions, consistent with theorized functions of autobiographical memory. With new digital technologies, people are documenting more memories than ever and are sharing them with larger audiences. However, these technologies do not change the core cognitive processes involved in autobiographical memory, but instead present novel situations that affect how these processes are deployed. Smartphones allow events to be recorded as they unfold, thus directing attention and sometimes impairing memory. Social media increase the frequency of reviewing and sharing records which reactivate memories, potentially strengthening or updating them. Overall, externalization in the digital age changes what people attend to and remember about their own experiences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2021.08.005

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The recorded content can be searched and analyzed.

    “and can be searched and analyzed (cf.Clowes, 2013;Eliseev & Marsh, 2021).”

    From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Eliseev & Marsh, 2021

  • Individuals usually neither want their internal memories to be replaced by external recordings nor do they strive for capturing as many moments of their lives as possible.

    “In close connection with this, individuals usually neither want their internal memories to be replaced by external recordings (Eliseev & Marsh, 2021;Harvey et al., 2016) nor do they strive for capturing as many moments of their lives as possible:”

    From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Eliseev & Marsh, 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eliseev, E. D., & Marsh, E. J.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Marsh, Elizabeth J.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
25
Issue
12
Pages
1072-1081
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3199026745
Cited by
47
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Google
  • Charles Lafitte Foundation
  • Duke University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
autobiographical memory, digital technologies, smartphones, social media, memory reactivation, memory updating, attention, memory impairment, self-documentation, memory sharing
MeSH terms
Attention, Humans, Mental Recall, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review