Externalizing autobiographical memories in the digital age
Abstract
People externalize their autobiographical memories by creating representations that exist outside of their minds. Externalizations often serve personal and social functions, consistent with theorized functions of autobiographical memory. With new digital technologies, people are documenting more memories than ever and are sharing them with larger audiences. However, these technologies do not change the core cognitive processes involved in autobiographical memory, but instead present novel situations that affect how these processes are deployed. Smartphones allow events to be recorded as they unfold, thus directing attention and sometimes impairing memory. Social media increase the frequency of reviewing and sharing records which reactivate memories, potentially strengthening or updating them. Overall, externalization in the digital age changes what people attend to and remember about their own experiences.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The recorded content can be searched and analyzed.
“and can be searched and analyzed (cf.Clowes, 2013;Eliseev & Marsh, 2021).”
From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Eliseev & Marsh, 2021
Individuals usually neither want their internal memories to be replaced by external recordings nor do they strive for capturing as many moments of their lives as possible.
“In close connection with this, individuals usually neither want their internal memories to be replaced by external recordings (Eliseev & Marsh, 2021;Harvey et al., 2016) nor do they strive for capturing as many moments of their lives as possible:”
From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Eliseev & Marsh, 2021
Cites
Google Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips
Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1207745 · Cited by 1,762 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There is some evidence that knowing information is safely stored elsewhere relieves people of the burden of remembering it ([14]; cf [15]).”
BackgroundRisko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002 · Cited by 1,502 · see citing works
Saving-Enhanced Memory: The Benefits of Saving on the Learning and Remembering of New Information
Storm, B. C., & Stone, S. M. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614559285 · Cited by 192 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Reducing one’s cognitive load provides resources for other tasks: when participants knew that a word list was externalized (saved to a computer), they rememberedmore of a second word list, known as the saving-enhanced memory effect [13].”
BackgroundHow taking photos increases enjoyment of experiences
Diehl, K., Zauberman, G., & Barasch, A. (2016) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000055 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
How the intention to share can undermine enjoyment: photo-taking goals and evaluation of experiences
Barasch, A., Zauberman, G., & Diehl, K. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx112 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Neural mechanisms of reactivation-induced updating that enhance and distort memory
St. Jacques, P. L., Olm, C., & Schacter, D. L. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1319630110 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Memory Manipulations in Extended Reality
Bonnail, E., Tseng, W.-J., Mcgill, M., Lecolinet, E., Huron, S., & Gugenheimer, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580988 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model
Hutmacher, F., Appel, M., & Schwan, S. (2024) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2024.2384125 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Eliseev, E. D., & Marsh, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Marsh, Elizabeth J.
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1072-1081
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3199026745
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 0.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Charles Lafitte Foundation
- Duke University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- autobiographical memory, digital technologies, smartphones, social media, memory reactivation, memory updating, attention, memory impairment, self-documentation, memory sharing
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Humans, Mental Recall, Memory, Episodic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review