Cited by 45Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingAgricultural safety and regulationsFood and Agricultural Sciences

Status of nutrition and health claims in Europe by mid 2015

Verhagen, Hans, van Loveren, Henk·2016·Trends in Food Science & Technology

Abstract

Functional foods are closely associated with claims on foods. There are two categories of claims on foods: nutrition claims and health claims. Nutrition claims refer to what a food contains and comprise content claims and comparative claims. Health claims refer to what a food does and refer to general function claims, claims related to a reduction of risk of disease and claims related to the growth and development of children.Health claims on (functional) foods must be scientifically substantiated. In December 2006, the European Union published Regulation 1924/2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) provides the scientific advice to the European Commission for health claims submitted under Regulation 1924/2006. By 2015, EFSA has evaluated around 3000 health claims.The outcome of the scientific evaluation process was that ca 250 health claims have been evaluated with a positive outcome, a few with insufficient evidence, whereas the large majority of health claims proposals were evaluated with the conclusion that the claim was not supported by scientific evidence. In addition to hundreds of opinions on health claims, EFSA has published various guidelines related to the scientific substantiation of health claims on foods and guidance documents for health claims related to diverse health endpoints. Upon scientific evaluation by EFSA, it is up to the European Commission and the member States to decide on authorisation. EU Regula…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tifs.2016.07.005

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verhagen, H., & van Loveren, H.
Affiliations
University of Ulster (GB)
Corresponding author
Verhagen, Hans
Venue
Trends in Food Science & Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
56
Pages
39-45
ISSN
0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2465895564
Cited by
45
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Food Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Rivm Repository (Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
nutrition claims, health claims, functional foods, vitamins and minerals, antioxidants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review