The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nutritional, functional and biological properties of insect proteins: Processes for obtaining, consumption and future challenges
Abstract
Abstract Background Consuming insects as an alternative protein source is considered a future trend and a viable strategy that could potentially contribute to global food security. Insects are a non-conventional source of protein, either for human consumption directly or indirectly as a component in recomposed foods or added to feedstock mixtures. Moreover, these proteins have demonstrated a broad range of applications as peptides with antihypertensive, antimicrobial and antioxidant properties. However, aspects such as food safety and processing of these proteins need further studies for their elucidation and optimization. Scope and approach In this review, aspects of nutritional value and risks of insect consumption are reported. Additionally, conventional processing techniques and recent advances in insect protein extraction and production are presented. The application of bioactive peptides obtained from insect protein hydrolysates is reported, focusing on their potential antihypertensive, antimicrobial and antioxidant properties. Key findings and conclusions Insect proteins have great advantages in terms of nutritional value, total protein level and amino acid profile. However, some safety concerns must be taken into consideration in large-scale production. The conventional processing of insects proteins is very particular, depending on several aspects such as species, larval stage, and cultivation, among others. Nonetheless, recent advances in insect protein production via enzymatic hydrolysis and heterologous expression have shown a promising technology for the study and exploitation of their bioactive properties, such as the antimicrobial, antioxidant and antihypertensive (inhibition of ACE) activity of insect peptides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Edible insects: an alternative of nutritional, functional and bioactive compounds.
Jantzen da Silva Lucas, A., Menegon de Oliveira, L., da Rocha, M., & Prentice, C. (2020) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.126022 · Cited by 412
Current state of chitin purification and chitosan production from insects
Hahn, T., Tafi, E., Paul, A., Salvia, R., Falabella, P., & Zibek, S. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1002/jctb.6533 · Cited by 373
Status of meat alternatives and their potential role in the future meat market - a review
Lee, H. J., Yong, H. I., Kim, M., Choi, Y.-S., & Jo, C. (2020) · Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences · doi:10.5713/ajas.20.0419 · Cited by 280
Algal proteins: Production strategies and nutritional and functional properties
Geada, P., Moreira, C., Silva, M., Nunes, R., Madureira, L., Rocha, C. M. R., Pereira, R. N., Vicente, A. A., & Teixeira, J. A. (2021) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125125 · Cited by 280
Current Trends of Bioactive Peptides—New Sources and Therapeutic Effect
Jakubczyk, A., Karaś, M., Rybczyńska-Tkaczyk, K., Zielińska, E., & Zieliński, D. (2020) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods9070846 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- de Castro, R. J. S., Ohara, A., Aguilar, J. G. D. S., & Domingues, M. A. F.
- Venue
- Trends in Food Science & Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 76
- Pages
- 82-89
- ISSN
- 0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2801109832
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutritional, functional and biological properties of insect proteins: Processes for obtaining, consumption and future challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.04.006
- The paper
- de Castro, R. J. S., Ohara, A., Aguilar, J. G. D. S., & Domingues, M. A. F. (2018). Nutritional, functional and biological properties of insect proteins: Processes for obtaining, consumption and future challenges. Trends in Food Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.04.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.