Cited by 17Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactSustainable Supply Chain Management

Trade-offs in food systems; How does upcycling edible resources fit in the big picture?

Altintzoglou, Themistoklis, Aschemann-Witzel, Jessica·2024·Trends in Food Science & Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104246

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Altintzoglou, T., & Aschemann-Witzel, J.
Affiliations
Nofima (NO)
Corresponding author
Altintzoglou, Themistoklis
Venue
Trends in Food Science & Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-01
Volume
143
Pages
104246
ISSN
0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388706559
Cited by
17
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Trends in Food Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Nofima AS
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
food waste upcycling, food systems, food loss and waste, trade-offs, food by-products, food processing innovation, ethical transparency, consumer trust, corporate reputation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review