Cited by 163Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactWaste Management and Recycling

Defining upcycled food: The dual role of upcycling in reducing food loss and waste

Open access
Aschemann-Witzel, Jessica, Asioli, Daniele, Banovic, Marija, Perito, Maria Angela, Peschel, Anne Odile, Stancu, Violeta·2023·Trends in Food Science & Technology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.01.001

Cites

30 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mainstreaming of upcycling in food systems has a large potential to improve circularity in the food system and offers new opportunities to create sustainable raw materials for the cosmetics industry.

    “The mainstreaming of the idea of upcycling in food systems has a large potential to improve circularity in the food system and offers new opportunities to create sustainable raw materials for the cosmetics industry [58–61].”

    From Use of Waste from the Food Industry and Applications of the Fermentation Process to Create Sustainable Cosmetic Products: A Review (2024) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Conclusions and implications section (page unavailable) says that upcycling has huge potential to contribute to a sustainable, circular food system and that mainstream thinking is needed to scale it. The cited paper does not support the additional claim about creating sustainable raw materials for the cosmetics industry; its examples concern food ingredients. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Residues from the agro and food industry end up most often in landfills, significantly contributing to global pollution by producing methane and greenhouse gas emissions.

    “Unfortunately, residues end up most often in landfills, significantly contributing to global pollution levels by producing significant amounts of methane, which consequently leads to greenhouse gas emissions [52,53,58,64,65].”

    From Use of Waste from the Food Industry and Applications of the Fermentation Process to Create Sustainable Cosmetic Products: A Review (2024) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Introduction (page not available in our copy) states that food waste accounts for about 8–10% of human-caused greenhouse gas emissions. It does not say that agro-food residues most often end up in landfills or attribute those emissions specifically to methane from landfills. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Food waste accounts for 8-10% of total anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, demonstrating that agriculture puts a strain on planetary ecosystems.

    “Food waste accounts for 8–10% of total anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, demonstrating that agriculture puts a strain on planetary ecosystems [58].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. EC (2008). Waste Framework Directive 2008/98/EC (WFD). Retrieved from https://eur- lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008L0098&from=EN EC (2020). European Commission, Directorate-General for Communication, Circular economy action plan: for a cleaner and more competitive Europe. Retrieved from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2779/05068 · DOI
  2. EC (2020). Farm to Fork Strategy: For a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/food/horizontal-topics/farm-fork-strategy_en EC (2020). Report of the 5th SCAR Foresight Exercise Expert Group -Natural resources and food systems: Transitions towards a 'safe and just' operating space. Retrieved from https://scar-europe.org/images/FORESIGHT/FINAL-REPORT-5th-SCAR-Foresight- Exercise.pdf EC (2022). EU Platform on Food Losses and Food Waste. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/food-waste/eu-actions-against-food-waste/eu-platform- food-losses-and-food-waste_en J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2019). Circularity Indicators. An Approach to Measuring Circularity, Methodology. Retrieved from https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/material- circularity-indicator Eurobarometer (2021). Eurobarometer 513 -Climate Action and the Environment, Climate Change. Retrieved from https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2273 Euromonitor International (2022). Top 10 global consumer trends 2022. Retrieved from https://www.euromonitor.com/article/what-are-the-10-global-consumer-trends-in-2022 FAO (2021). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2021. Transforming food systems for food security, improved nutrition and affordable healthy diets for all. Rome, FAO.: FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4474en FAO (2022). FAO Food Price Index. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/foodpricesindex/en/ FAO (2022). Technical Platform on the Measurement and Reduction of Food Loss and Waste. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/platform-food-loss-waste/en/ FMCG Gurus (2022). FMCG Gurus -Top Ten Trends for 2022 -Global Report. Retrieved from https://fmcggurus.com/reports/fmcg-gurus-top-ten-trends-for-2022-global-report/ · DOI
  3. IPCC (2019). Special report: special report on climate change and land: chapter 5. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/chapter/chapter-5/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aschemann-Witzel, J., Asioli, D., Banovic, M., Perito, M. A., Peschel, A. O., & Stancu, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Reading (GB)
  • University of Teramo (IT)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
Venue
Trends in Food Science & Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-02
Volume
132
Pages
132-137
ISSN
0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313856687
Cited by
161
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 13
FWCI
23.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Food Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (submittedVersion)
  • UniTERAMO Research Catalog (University of Teramo) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • UNICEF
  • International Fund for Agricultural Development
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
Keywords
upcycled food, food loss and waste reduction, food waste, food by-products

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review