Cited by 76Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensingGut microbiota and healthMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

Interpreting infective microbiota: the importance of an ecological perspective

Open access
Rogers, Geraint B., Hoffman, Lucas R., Carroll, Mary P., Bruce, Kenneth D.·2013·Trends in Microbiology

Abstract

Complex microbiota are being reported increasingly across a range of chronic infections, including those of the cystic fibrosis airways. Such diversity fits poorly into classical models of sterile tissue infections, which generally involve one species, and where microbe-outcome associations usually imply causality. It has been suggested that microbiota at sites of infection could represent pathogenic entities, analogous to individual species. We argue that our ability to identify causality in microbiota-disease associations is, however, inherently confounded. Although particular microbiota may be associated with clinical outcomes, niche characteristics at sites of infection will shape microbiota composition through exerting selective pressures. Here, we suggest that ecological theory can inform clinical understanding.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tim.2013.03.004

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rogers, G. B., Hoffman, L. R., Carroll, M. P., & Bruce, K. D.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Rogers, Geraint B.
Venue
Trends in Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
271-276
ISSN
0966-842X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015961680
Cited by
76
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K02HL105543)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
chronic infection, cystic fibrosis, airway microbiome, ecological theory, niche characteristics, microbial diversity, host-microbe interactions
MeSH terms
Cystic Fibrosis, Humans, Lung, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas Infections, Ecosystem, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review