The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are specific learning disorders truly specific, and are they disorders?
Open accessAbstract
Specific learning disorders, such as dyslexia and dyscalculia, are frequently studied to inform our understanding of cognitive development, genetic mechanisms and brain function. In this Opinion Paper, we discuss limitations of this research approach, including the use of arbitrary criteria to select groups of children, heterogeneity within groups and overlap between domains of learning. By drawing on evidence from cognitive science, neuroscience and genetics, we propose an alternative, dimensional framework. We argue that we need to overcome the problems associated with a categorical approach by taking into account interacting factors at multiple levels of analysis that are associated with overlapping rather than entirely distinct domains of learning. We conclude that this research strategy will allow for a richer understanding of learning and development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Dyslexia and dyscalculia seem to involve distinct cognitive profiles in terms of domain-specific processes (mainly phonological deficits for the former, and number processing deficits for the latter), but similar domain-general cognitive processes (particularly concerning WM).”
From Executive Functions in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Comorbidity Overlaps Between Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder and Specific Learning Disorders (2021) · cites this paper as Peters and Ansari, 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Domain-general cognitive processes like WM may therefore substantially overlap between dyslexia and dyscalculia (Peters and Ansari, 2019).”
From Executive Functions in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Comorbidity Overlaps Between Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder and Specific Learning Disorders (2021) · cites this paper as Peters and Ansari, 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2013) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · Cited by 116,369
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Open Science Collaboration (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac4716 · Cited by 8,515
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3475 · Cited by 7,641 · cited 2×
“Put differently, the same genes that contribute to individual differences in the lower end of the distribution, also contribute to individual differences in the upper end (see [25] for a review).”
BackgroundNetwork analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology
Borsboom, D., & Cramer, A. O. J. (2013) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608 · Cited by 4,359
Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades?
Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x · Cited by 2,555
The p Factor: One General Psychopathology Factor in the Structure of Psychiatric Disorders?
Caspi, A., Houts, R. M., Belsky, D. W., Goldman-Mellor, S. J., Harrington, H., Israel, S., Meier, M. H., Ramrakha, S., Shalev, I., Poulton, R., et al. (2014) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702613497473 · Cited by 2,449
Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research
Poldrack, R. A., Baker, C. I., Durnez, J., Gorgolewski, K. J., Matthews, P. M., Munafò, M. R., Nichols, T. E., Poline, J.-B., Vul, E., & Yarkoni, T. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.167 · Cited by 1,410
Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1998) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01230-3 · Cited by 1,299
From single to multiple deficit models of developmental disorders
PENNINGTON, B. (2006) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.04.008 · Cited by 1,167
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Dehaene, 1995, Towards an anatomical and functional model of number processing, Math. Cognit., 1, 83
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Crisci, G., Caviola, S., Cardillo, R., & Mammarella, I. C. (2021) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2021.594234 · Cited by 103
“Domaingeneral cognitive processes like WM may therefore substantially overlap between dyslexia and dyscalculia (Peters and Ansari, 2019).”
BackgroundIt’s Time to Be Scientific About Dyslexia
Elliott, J. G. (2020) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.333 · Cited by 100
No evidence for a core deficit in developmental dyscalculia or mathematical learning disabilities
Mammarella, I. C., Toffalini, E., Caviola, S., Colling, L. J., & Szűcs, D. (2021) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13397 · Cited by 76
Peters, L., de Beeck, H. O., & Smedt, B. D. (2020) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103806 · Cited by 66
Self-citationDecarli, G., Sella, F., Lanfranchi, S., Gerotto, G., Gerola, S., Cossu, G., & Zorzi, M. (2022) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976221097947 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Peters, L., & Ansari, D.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Peters, Lien
- Venue
- Trends in Neuroscience and Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 17
- Pages
- 100115
- ISSN
- 2211-9493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2956070372
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 108
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 12
- FWCI
- 3.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Trends in Neuroscience and Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Jacobs Foundation
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (93609)
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN/04644-2017)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Keywords
- specific learning disorders, dyslexia, dyscalculia, categorical classification, diagnostic criteria, group heterogeneity, cognitive development, brain function
- MeSH terms
- Specific Learning Disorder, Child, Developmental Disabilities, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Dyslexia, Humans, Learning Disabilities, Dyscalculia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review