Cited by 1,410Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesScientific Computing and Data ManagementAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research

Open access
Poldrack, Russell A., Baker, Chris I., Durnez, Joke, Gorgolewski, Krzysztof J., Matthews, Paul M., Munafò, Marcus R., Nichols, Thomas E., Poline, Jean-Baptiste +2 more·2017·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging techniques have transformed our ability to probe the neurobiological basis of behaviour and are increasingly being applied by the wider neuroscience community. However, concerns have recently been raised that the conclusions that are drawn from some human neuroimaging studies are either spurious or not generalizable. Problems such as low statistical power, flexibility in data analysis, software errors and a lack of direct replication apply to many fields, but perhaps particularly to functional MRI. Here, we discuss these problems, outline current and suggested best practices, and describe how we think the field should evolve to produce the most meaningful and reliable answers to neuroscientific questions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn.2016.167

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poldrack, R. A., Baker, C. I., Durnez, J., Gorgolewski, K. J., Matthews, P. M., Munafò, M. R., Nichols, T. E., Poline, J.-B., Vul, E., & Yarkoni, T.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
  • Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Poldrack, Russell A.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2017-01-05
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
115-126
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2571093196
Cited by
1,410
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 123 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 141 · 2022: 157 · 2021: 159 · 2020: 141 · 2019: 172 · 2018: 125 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 4
FWCI
15.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Laura and John Arnold Foundation
  • Wellcome Trust (1U54MH091657, 100309/Z/12/Z., 100309/A/12/Z)
  • United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration
  • Cancer Research UK
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0514-10022)
  • British Heart Foundation
  • Imperial College London
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
  • National Institutes of Health (5u54mh091657-05, 100309/Z/12/Z, 1U54‐MH‐091657, EB019936)
  • McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience (1U54MH091657)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K023195/1, 12013/6, 1U54MH091657, MR/M024903/1, MC_UU_12013/6, MR/N026934/1, MC_PC_17114)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (1U54MH091657, 100309/Z/12/Z)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007489/1)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (1U54 MH091657, U54-MH091657, ZIAMH002909, R01MH096906)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (1U54MH091657)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS075066)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (1U54MH091657, R01EB015611, EB019936, P41EB019936)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
reproducibility, transparency, functional MRI, statistical power, software errors, direct replication, research reliability, best practices, neuroimaging research
MeSH terms
Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Software, Statistics as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review