Cited by 634Vestibular and auditory disordersMultisensory perception and integrationMotor Control and Adaptation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The vestibular system: multimodal integration and encoding of self-motion for motor control

Open access
Cullen, Kathleen E.·2012·Trends in Neurosciences

Abstract

Understanding how sensory pathways transmit information under natural conditions remains a major goal in neuroscience. The vestibular system plays a vital role in everyday life, contributing to a wide range of functions from reflexes to the highest levels of voluntary behavior. Recent experiments establishing that vestibular (self-motion) processing is inherently multimodal also provide insight into a set of interrelated questions. What neural code is used to represent sensory information in vestibular pathways? How do the interactions between the organism and the environment shape encoding? How is self-motion information processing adjusted to meet the needs of specific tasks? This review highlights progress that has recently been made towards understanding how the brain encodes and processes self-motion to ensure accurate motor control.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tins.2011.12.001

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 116 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 634

Metadata

Authors
Cullen, K. E.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Cullen, Kathleen E.
Venue
Trends in Neurosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
185-196
ISSN
0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041756956
Cited by
630
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC-002390, R01DC002390)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
vestibular system, self-motion perception, multimodal integration, neural coding, vestibular pathways, motor control, sensory integration, vestibular processing
MeSH terms
Animals, Postural Balance, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Motion, Motion Perception, Movement, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Orientation, Proprioception, Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular, Vestibule, Labyrinth, Vestibular Nuclei, Vision, Ocular, Linear Models, Head Movements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review