Cited by 76Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlNeural dynamics and brain functionEmbodied and Extended Cognition

Cognition through the lens of a body–brain dynamic system

Open access
Criscuolo, Antonio, Schwartze, Michael, Kotz, Sonja A.·2022·Trends in Neurosciences

Abstract

Continuous interactions between physiological body-brain rhythms influence how individuals act, perceive, and evaluate their environment. Despite increasing interest, the intricate interface between breathing, cardiac, neural rhythms, and cognitive function remains poorly understood. By evaluating current theoretical and empirical implications, we derive an integrative framework of a 'body-brain dynamic system' that combines a hidden hierarchical structure with dynamical state transitions. We propose that body-brain signals can interchangeably drive state- and task-specific coupling mechanisms which influence cognitive functions. The dynamical nature of this framework parallels the intrinsic variability of human behavior, and ultimately aims at better understanding how individuals act in and adapt to a dynamically changing environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tins.2022.06.004

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The three frameworks (oscillatory synchrony, predictive coding, and multisensory integration) are not mutually exclusive.

    “The three frameworks are not mutually exclusive (see, e.g. 195 ), but they influence experimental paradigms and color the interpretation of findings, sometimes implicitly.”

    From Interoceptive rhythms in the brain (2023) · cites this paper as [195]

    The paper discusses predictive coding as a possible explanation for rhythm-dependent perception and, in its discussion of perceptual cycles, connects multisensory perception with the phase of neural activity. These passages are consistent with the frameworks being compatible, but the paper does not explicitly identify the three named frameworks as a group or state that they are not mutually exclusive. The cited passages appear under “Trends in Neurosciences”; our copy provides no page number for them. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Fleming, S. et al. (2011) Normal ranges of heart rate and respira- tory rate in children from birth to 18 years of age: a systematic review of observational studies. Lancet 377, 1011-1018
  2. Park, H.D. and Tallon-Baudry, C. (2014) The neural subjective frame: from bodily signals to perceptual consciousness. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 369
  3. Doelling, K.B. and Poeppel, D. (2015) Cortical entrainment to music and its modulation by expertise. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
  4. Plum, F. (2008) Neurological integration of behavioural and met- abolic control of breathing. In Breathing (2008) (Porter, R., ed.), pp. 159-181, Wiley
  5. Al, E. et al. (2020) Heart-brain interactions shape somatosensory perception and evoked potentials. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117, 10575-10584
  6. Friston, K. (2005) A theory of cortical responses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 360, 815-836

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Criscuolo, A., Schwartze, M., & Kotz, S. A.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Kotz, Sonja A.
Venue
Trends in Neurosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
45
Issue
9
Pages
667-677
ISSN
0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283824336
Cited by
76
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (406.18.GO.063, 406.18, GO.063)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
physiological rhythms, breathing, cardiac rhythm, neural oscillations, cognitive function, hierarchy, coupling mechanism, environmental adaptation, behavioral variability
MeSH terms
Brain, Cognition, Humans, Respiration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review