Cited by 544Pharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and ProtectionAnimal testing and alternatives

Cytochrome P450 enzyme levels in HepG2 cells and cryopreserved primary human hepatocytes and their induction in HepG2 cells

Westerink, Walter M.A., Schoonen, Willem G.E.J.·2007·Toxicology in Vitro

Abstract

Early in vitro toxicity screening might improve the success rate of new chemical entities in pharmaceutical development. In previous studies, the advantage of cytotoxicity screening with the HepG2 cell line was shown. Cytotoxicity could be identified for 70% of the compounds in these assays as compared with known toxicity in either in vitro assays in primary hepatocytes, in in vivo assays in rats, or in (pre-)clinical development in humans. The low Phase I and II enzyme levels in HepG2 cells might have been responsible for the fact that 30% of the compounds scored negative. Therefore, we performed two follow-up studies in which Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and Phase II metabolism were examined. In the present study, the transcript levels of CYP1A1, 1A2, 2A6, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 2E1, and 3A4 were measured with quantitative PCR. Results showed that transcripts of all CYPs were present in HepG2 cells, however, mRNA levels of most CYPs were dramatically lower than in primary human hepatocytes. These results were confirmed with luminometric assays which were used to measure the enzyme activities of CYP1A1, 1A2, 2C9, and 3A4. Regulation of CYP1A1, 1A2, 2B6, 2C8, 2D6, 2E1, and 3A4 by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, pregnane X receptor and constitutive androstane receptor was studied in HepG2 cells at the mRNA and/or enzyme level. Regulation of CYP1A1, 1A2, 2B6, and 3A4 mRNA levels was similar to the regulation in primary human hepatocytes. In contrast, CYP2C8 mRNA levels are inducible in primary human hepatocytes, but not in HepG2 cells, after treatment with PXR/CAR activators. Consistent with other studies, CYP2D6 and 2E1 transcript levels were not changed after treatment with AhR, PXR, and CAR activators. Moreover, CYP1A1 and 1A2 enzyme levels could be induced by AhR agonists and CYP3A4 by PXR agonists. As a consequence of the low levels of CYPs in HepG2 cells, cytotoxicity of several compounds might have been missed or underestimated as compared with cytotoxicity in primary human hepatocytes. Inducing HepG2 cells with particular receptor stimulators might lead to higher toxicity for several of the tested compounds. Compared to primary human hepatocytes, HepG2 cells are a relatively easy-to-handle tool to study the up-regulation of CYP1A1, 1A2, 2B6, and 3A4.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tiv.2007.05.014

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HepG2 has sharply reduced expression of Phase I CYP450 enzymes compared to primary human hepatocytes, with mRNA levels of key isoforms hundreds of times lower.

    “HepG2 is characterized by a sharply reduced expression of Phase I biotransformation enzymes— CYP450 —compared to primary human hepatocytes [102,103,104,105].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Westerink, W. M. A., & Schoonen, W. G. E. J.
Affiliations
Organon (Netherlands) (NL)
Corresponding author
Westerink, Walter M.A.
Venue
Toxicology in Vitro
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-12
Volume
21
Issue
8
Pages
1581-1591
ISSN
0887-2333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072624946
Cited by
544
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 42
FWCI
22.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Toxicology in Vitro (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
Keywords
cytochrome P450, HepG2 cells, primary human hepatocytes, cytochrome P450 induction, CYP gene expression, aryl hydrocarbon receptor, pregnane X receptor, constitutive androstane receptor, CYP3A4, CYP1A1, CYP2C8, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, CYP2A6, CYP2C19, CYP1A2, phase II metabolism
MeSH terms
Pregnane X Receptor, Constitutive Androstane Receptor, Aged, Cell Line, Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System, Enzyme Induction, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Receptors, Steroid, RNA, Messenger, Transcription Factors, Cryopreservation, Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear, Receptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon, Hepatocytes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review