Cytochrome P450 enzyme levels in HepG2 cells and cryopreserved primary human hepatocytes and their induction in HepG2 cells
Abstract
Early in vitro toxicity screening might improve the success rate of new chemical entities in pharmaceutical development. In previous studies, the advantage of cytotoxicity screening with the HepG2 cell line was shown. Cytotoxicity could be identified for 70% of the compounds in these assays as compared with known toxicity in either in vitro assays in primary hepatocytes, in in vivo assays in rats, or in (pre-)clinical development in humans. The low Phase I and II enzyme levels in HepG2 cells might have been responsible for the fact that 30% of the compounds scored negative. Therefore, we performed two follow-up studies in which Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and Phase II metabolism were examined. In the present study, the transcript levels of CYP1A1, 1A2, 2A6, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 2E1, and 3A4 were measured with quantitative PCR. Results showed that transcripts of all CYPs were present in HepG2 cells, however, mRNA levels of most CYPs were dramatically lower than in primary human hepatocytes. These results were confirmed with luminometric assays which were used to measure the enzyme activities of CYP1A1, 1A2, 2C9, and 3A4. Regulation of CYP1A1, 1A2, 2B6, 2C8, 2D6, 2E1, and 3A4 by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, pregnane X receptor and constitutive androstane receptor was studied in HepG2 cells at the mRNA and/or enzyme level. Regulation of CYP1A1, 1A2, 2B6, and 3A4 mRNA levels was similar to the regulation in primary human hepatocytes. In contrast, CYP2C8 mRNA levels are inducible in primary human hepatocytes, but not in HepG2 cells, after treatment with PXR/CAR activators. Consistent with other studies, CYP2D6 and 2E1 transcript levels were not changed after treatment with AhR, PXR, and CAR activators. Moreover, CYP1A1 and 1A2 enzyme levels could be induced by AhR agonists and CYP3A4 by PXR agonists. As a consequence of the low levels of CYPs in HepG2 cells, cytotoxicity of several compounds might have been missed or underestimated as compared with cytotoxicity in primary human hepatocytes. Inducing HepG2 cells with particular receptor stimulators might lead to higher toxicity for several of the tested compounds. Compared to primary human hepatocytes, HepG2 cells are a relatively easy-to-handle tool to study the up-regulation of CYP1A1, 1A2, 2B6, and 3A4.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
HepG2 has sharply reduced expression of Phase I CYP450 enzymes compared to primary human hepatocytes, with mRNA levels of key isoforms hundreds of times lower.
“HepG2 is characterized by a sharply reduced expression of Phase I biotransformation enzymes— CYP450 —compared to primary human hepatocytes [102,103,104,105].”
From The HepG2 Cell Line as a Model for Studying Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (2026) · cites this paper as [103]
Cites
Indirubin and Indigo Are Potent Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Ligands Present in Human Urine
Adachi, J., Mori, Y., Matsui, S., Takigami, H., Fujino, J., Kitagawa, H., Miller, C. A., Kato, T., Saeki, K., & Matsuda, T. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.c100238200 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Rubin, G. L. (1999) · Molecular Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/molehr/5.11.995 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Glyphosate-based herbicides are toxic and endocrine disruptors in human cell lines
Gasnier, C., Dumont, C., Benachour, N., Clair, E., Chagnon, M.-C., & Séralini, G.-E. (2009) · Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.tox.2009.06.006 · Cited by 658 · see citing works
Organotypic liver culture models: meeting current challenges in toxicity testing
LeCluyse, E. L., Witek, R. P., Andersen, M. E., & Powers, M. J. (2012) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.3109/10408444.2012.682115 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Guo, L., Dial, S., Shi, L., Branham, W., Liu, J., Fang, J.-L., Green, B., Deng, H., Kaput, J., & Ning, B. (2011) · Drug Metabolism and Disposition · doi:10.1124/dmd.110.035873 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Jennen, D. G. J., Magkoufopoulou, C., Ketelslegers, H. B., van Herwijnen, M. H. M., Kleinjans, J. C. S., & van Delft, J. H. M. (2010) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfq026 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Yokoyama, Y., Sasaki, Y., Terasaki, N., Kawataki, T., Takekawa, K., Iwase, Y., Shimizu, T., Sanoh, S., & Ohta, S. (2018) · Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin · doi:10.1248/bpb.b17-00913 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Primary Hepatocyte Isolation and Cultures: Technical Aspects, Challenges and Advancements
Kaur, I., Vasudevan, A., Rawal, P., Tripathi, D. M., Ramakrishna, S., Kaur, S., & Sarin, S. K. (2023) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering10020131 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Kammerer, S. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms221910214 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Chen, S., Wu, Q., Li, X., Li, D., Mei, N., Ning, B., Puig, M., Ren, Z., Tolleson, W. H., & Guo, L. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C · doi:10.1080/26896583.2021.1880242 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Defined plant extracts can protect human cells against combined xenobiotic effects
Gasnier, C., Laurant, C., Decroix-Laporte, C., Mesnage, R., Clair, E., Travert, C., & Séralini, G.-E. (2011) · Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology · doi:10.1186/1745-6673-6-3 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Negoro, R., Tasaka, M., Deguchi, S., Takayama, K., & Fujita, T. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11101677 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
The HepG2 Cell Line as a Model for Studying Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease
Kotlyarova, A., Iskrina, A., & Kotlyarov, S. (2026) · International journal of molecular sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms27083399 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Westerink, W. M. A., & Schoonen, W. G. E. J.
- Affiliations
- Organon (Netherlands) (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Westerink, Walter M.A.
- Venue
- Toxicology in Vitro
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1581-1591
- ISSN
- 0887-2333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072624946
- Cited by
- 544
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 42
- FWCI
- 22.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Toxicology in Vitro (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Keywords
- cytochrome P450, HepG2 cells, primary human hepatocytes, cytochrome P450 induction, CYP gene expression, aryl hydrocarbon receptor, pregnane X receptor, constitutive androstane receptor, CYP3A4, CYP1A1, CYP2C8, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, CYP2A6, CYP2C19, CYP1A2, phase II metabolism
- MeSH terms
- Pregnane X Receptor, Constitutive Androstane Receptor, Aged, Cell Line, Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System, Enzyme Induction, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Receptors, Steroid, RNA, Messenger, Transcription Factors, Cryopreservation, Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear, Receptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon, Hepatocytes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review