Cited by 351Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence AnalysisPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

General approach for the calculation of tissue to plasma partition coefficients

Schmitt, Walter·2008·Toxicology in Vitro

Abstract

A new mechanistic, universal model for the calculation of steady state tissue:plasma partition coefficients (Kt:p) of organic chemicals in mammalian species was developed. The approach allows the estimation of Kt:p-values based on the composition of the tissues in terms of water, neutral lipids, neutral and acidic phospholipids and proteins using the lipophilicity, the binding to phospholipid membranes, the pKa and the unbound fraction in blood plasma as compound specific parameters. Taking explicitly into account the sign and fraction of the charge of the compounds at the physiological pH the method is universally applicable to neutral, acidic, basic or multiply charged substances and has thus a significantly extended applicability compared to previously published approaches. The model was applied to 59 chemically diverse drug compounds for which tissue:plasma partition coefficients are reported in the literature. In total 474 experimentally observed Kt:p values for 12 tissues and the red blood cells were available and could be compared to model results. For 73% of the calculated values a deviation less than 3-fold from the respective observed value was found, proving the validity of the approach.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tiv.2007.09.010

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmitt, W.
Affiliations
Bayer (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Schmitt, Walter
Venue
Toxicology in Vitro
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
457-467
ISSN
0887-2333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026015795
Cited by
349
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Toxicology in Vitro (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Keywords
tissue-to-plasma partition coefficient, organic compounds, lipophilicity, tissue composition, pKa, drug compounds, mechanistic model, erythrocytes
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Chemistry, Physical, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Lipids, Phospholipids, Plasma, Proteins, Tissue Distribution, Models, Statistical, Xenobiotics, Extracellular Fluid, Rats, Chemical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review