Cited by 50Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment

The influence of study design and sex-differences on results from developmental neurotoxicity studies of bisphenol A, implications for toxicity testing

Beronius, Anna, Johansson, Niklas, Rudén, Christina, Hanberg, Annika·2013·Toxicology

Abstract

Developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) of bisphenol A (BPA) has been investigated in a large number of studies. However, there are discrepancies in the results reported between the studies. The aim of this study was to identify and analyze factors that may contribute to these differences and to assess whether there are sex-differences in the sensitivity of certain endpoints or tests used in DNT-studies. Forty-four DNT studies of BPA were identified from the open literature. Details about study design and results from each study, as well as the criteria for DNT testing according to the standardized OECD test guideline (TG) 426, were collected in a database. This enabled systematic and detailed comparisons between studies as well as to the criteria and recommendations stated in TG 426. Multivariate analyses were also used to investigate how different factors of the study design contributed to differences in study results. The analyses showed behavioral effects were often observed for endpoints that are not required according to OECD TG 426, such as anxiety-related, social and sexual behaviors, especially at very low doses and in female offspring. On the other hand relatively few studies observed any effects on motor activity, which is commonly used in screening for neurotoxic effects in regulatory testing. However, varied and to some extent seemingly contradictory results have been reported in these studies, especially for endpoints related to motor activity and anxiety and exploration. Many studies were also poorly reported, limiting these analyses. No strong conclusions could be drawn from the multivariate analyses. A few factors of study design, such as the size of the dose and number of dose levels used and the use of litter or individual pup as statistical unit seemed to have some influence on study results. In conclusion, this analysis suggests that DNT-studies conducted according to the standardized OECD TG 426 may overlook sensitive effects of BPA, and possibly other potential endocrine disruptors, especially in female offspring.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tox.2013.02.012

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a detailed review of 44 developmental neurotoxicity studies of BPA treatment, Beronius et al. (2013) reported that a higher number of significant BPA effects were detected in anxiety, social, and sexual endpoints than in conventional motor activity endpoints.

    “For example, in a detailed review of 44 developmental neurotoxicity studies of BPA treatment, Beronius et al. (2013) reported that a higher number of significant BPA effects were detected in anxiety, social, and sexual endpoints than in conventional motor activity endpoints, suggesting the need to assess a wide range of endpoints in behavioral studies of BPA exposure.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beronius, A., Johansson, N., Rudén, C., & Hanberg, A.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Corresponding author
Beronius, Anna
Venue
Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
311
Issue
1-2
Pages
13-26
ISSN
0300-483X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084132093
Cited by
50
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Keywords
bisphenol A, developmental neurotoxicity, sex differences, research design, behavioral effects, anxiety-like behavior, social behavior, sexual behavior, motor activity, female offspring, endocrine disruptors, toxicity testing, dose levels
MeSH terms
Bisphenol A Compounds, Animals, Benzhydryl Compounds, Female, Humans, Male, Phenols, Research Design, Sex Characteristics, Toxicity Tests, Neurotoxicity Syndromes, Endpoint Determination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review