Cited by 7Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

Lack of Interaction of the Fluorosurfactant C6O4 with Human Renal Transporters: In Vitro/in Silico Analysis

Open access
Bruno, Stefania, Bersani, Matteo, Astore, Serena, Chiabotto, Giulia, Barge, Alessandro, Binello, Arianna, Spyrakis, Francesca·2022·Toxicology

Abstract

C6O4 is a water soluble perfluoroether carboxylic acid ammonium salt used as surfactant in the synthesis of fluoropolymers. Available experimental data in rats exposed by the oral route indicate it is eliminated in urine. Previous studies with various linear perfluorocarboxylic acids have suggested that these compounds are substrates of renal membrane transporters in rats and humans, and that the interaction with basal and apical membrane transporters can influence the elimination kinetic by these organisms and explain, in part, the observed differences in the respective half-lives. In particular, apical transporters may contribute to the reuptake of these exogenous compounds from the tubule lumen. The present study was designed to investigate the uptake of C6O4 in two renal cell lines transiently transfected with the human apical membrane transporters, organic anion transporter 4 (OAT4), and urate transporter 1 (URAT1). The uptake of the linear perfluorohexanoic acid (PFC6) was evaluated in parallel. While the uptake of the conjugated steroid estrone-3-sulfate (E3S), a known substrate for renal transporters, and of PFC6 was clearly observed in both cell types transfected with either OAT4 or URAT1, no significant uptake of C6O4 was measured under the same test conditions. The results of the transporter's functionality measured in vitro were consistent with molecular docking simulations. Both outward and inward models of the transporters showed a reduced interaction between C6O4 and URAT1 or OAT4. In contrast, more stable interactions were predicted for PFC6 and PFOA, as well as for the E3S substrate, as shown by the respective docking scores reflecting the binding strength and by the poses assumed in the transporter channels. Altogether, the in vitro and in silico modeling results showed a low reuptake potential and limited interactions of C6O4 molecule with two human apical membrane transporters, contrasting with the more efficient reuptake of PFC6 from the tubule lumen. These results suggest reabsorption from the proximal tubule by apical renal transporters is not likely to interfere with the elimination pathway of C6O4 in humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tox.2022.153257

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • C6O4 showed negligible uptake in two renal cell lines transfected with either URAT1 or OAT4, whereas both URAT1- and OAT4-transfected cells displayed uptake of the reference PFAS PFC6.

    “By contrast, an examination of a new-generation PFAS, C6O4, in two renal cell lines transfected with either URAT1 or OAT4 showed negligible C6O4 uptake under the experimental conditions, whereas both URAT1- and OAT4-transfected cells displayed uptake of the reference PFAS, perfluorohexanoic acid (PFC6).”
  • Different transport mechanisms exist for different PFAS, with these mechanisms potentially influencing their elimination and bioaccumulation in the body.

    “These results highlight the existence of different transport mechanisms for different PFAS, with these mechanisms potentially influencing their elimination and bioaccumulation in the body [45].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. X. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bruno, S., Bersani, M., Astore, S., Chiabotto, G., Barge, A., Binello, A., & Spyrakis, F.
Affiliations
University of Turin (IT)
Corresponding author
Bruno, Stefania
Venue
Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
476
Pages
153257
ISSN
0300-483X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285035084
Cited by
7
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Toxicology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Keywords
fluorosurfactants, renal transporters, URAT1, perfluorocarboxylic acids, perfluorooctanoic acid, estrone-3-sulfate, tubular reabsorption, molecular docking, urinary excretion
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Transport, Humans, Kidney, Membrane Transport Proteins, Organic Anion Transporters, Rats, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review