The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Chakravarti, D., Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1997) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151869 · Cited by 7,141
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692 · Cited by 2,587
The Advantages of an Inclusive Definition of Attitude
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (2007) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.582 · Cited by 1,258
Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.002 · Cited by 880
Self-citationSocial Justice: Outcome and Procedure
Tyler, T. R. (2000) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/002075900399411 · Cited by 774
Self-Generated Attitude Change
Tesser, A. (1978) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60010-6 · Cited by 642
Attitude construction: evaluation in context
Schwarz, N. (2007) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.638 · Cited by 627
Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies
Schade, J., & Schlag, B. (2003) · Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s1369-8478(02)00046-3 · Cited by 498
Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., & Nordlund, A. M. (2006) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.05.003 · Cited by 369
Cited by
Overcoming public resistance to carbon taxes
Carattini, S., Carvalho, M., & Fankhauser, S. (2018) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.531 · Cited by 455
Poortinga, W., Whitmarsh, L., & Suffolk, C. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.09.001 · Cited by 276
Why cities need to take road space from cars - and how this could be done
Gössling, S. (2020) · Journal of Urban Design · doi:10.1080/13574809.2020.1727318 · Cited by 268
Verberne, F. M. F., Ham, J., & Midden, C. J. H. (2012) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720812443825 · Cited by 262
Expanding the role for psychology in addressing environmental challenges
Clayton, S., Devine-Wright, P., Swim, J., Bonnes, M., Steg, L., Whitmarsh, L., & Carrico, A. (2016) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0039482 · Cited by 188
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schuitema, G., Steg, L., & Forward, S.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 99-109
- ISSN
- 0965-8564 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055170489
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 16.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tra.2009.11.005
- The paper
- Schuitema, G., Steg, L., & Forward, S. (2010). Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2009.11.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.