Interacting with limited mobility resources: psychological range levels in electric vehicle use
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Much of the current literature looks to explain the barriers that individual consumers encounter when purchasing EVs, either using qualitative methods or choice experiments.
“As such, much of the current literature looks to explain the barriers that individual consumers encounter when purchasing EVs, either using qualitative methods (Egbue and Long, 2012;Schuitema et al., 2013;Franke and Krems, 2013), or also commonly, choice experiments to analyze willingness-to-pay for electric vehicles (Jensen et al., 2013;Noel et al., 2019;Hidrue et al., 2011).”
From Understanding the socio-technical nexus of Nordic electric vehicle (EV) barriers: A qualitative discussion of range, price, charging and knowledge (2020) · cites this paper as Franke and Krems, 2013
Cites
Statistical power analyses using G∗Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.41.4.1149 · Cited by 37,615 · see citing works
What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications
Cortina, J. M. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98 · Cited by 8,810 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Such a result is not uncommon for scales combining only two subscores (Cortina, 1993).”
BackgroundCacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116 · Cited by 5,359 · see citing works
Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100352 · Cited by 2,424 · see citing works
Relations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis.
Connor-Smith, J. K., & Flachsbart, C. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1080 · Cited by 1,453 · see citing works
The role of risk-propensity in the risky driving of younger drivers
Hatfield, J., & Fernandes, R. (2009) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2008.08.023 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Subjective competence, appraisals and self-assessment.
Boekaerts, M. (1991) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/0959-4752(91)90016-2 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Trait impulsiveness and executive function in healthy young adults
Pietrzak, R. H., Sprague, A., & Snyder, P. J. (2008) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.004 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Noel, L., Zarazua de Rubens, G., Kester, J., & Sovacool, B. K. (2020) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111292 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
- Authors
- Franke, T., & Krems, J. F.
- Affiliations
- Chemnitz University of Technology (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Franke, Thomas
- Venue
- Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 48
- Pages
- 109-122
- ISSN
- 0965-8564 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137072980
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10
- FWCI
- 9.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
- Keywords
- electric vehicles, driving range, range use, self-regulation, reference values, personality traits, control beliefs, impulsivity, early adopters, range anxiety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review