Exploring key determinants of travel satisfaction for multi-modal trips by different traveler groups
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In multi-modal trips, access and egress trip stage satisfaction were most impacted by the primary trip, which was often defined using trip leg duration.
“in multi-modal trips, access and egress trip stage satisfaction were most impacted by the primary trip, which was often defined using trip leg duration.”
From Does improving stop amenities help increase Bus Rapid Transit ridership? Findings based on a quasi-experiment (2021) · cites this paper as Susilo and Cats, 2014
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
Russell, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077714 · Cited by 16,334 · see citing works
(2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803475 · Cited by 2,987 · see citing works
Mobile technologies in mobile spaces: Findings from the context of train travel
Axtell, C., Hislop, D., & Whittaker, S. (2008) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.07.001 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shi, X., Moudon, A. V., Hurvitz, P. M., Mooney, S. J., Zhou, C., & Saelens, B. E. (2021) · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2021.100323 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Susilo, Y. O., & Cats, O.
- ORCID
- Susilo, Yusak O.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 67
- Pages
- 366-380
- ISSN
- 0965-8564
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
- Funders
- European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (314354)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
