Cited by 35Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysRedox biology and oxidative stressCell death mechanisms and regulation

The Mutant p53-Targeting Compound APR-246 Induces ROS-Modulating Genes in Breast Cancer Cells

Open access
Synnott, Naoise C., Madden, Stephen F., Bykov, Vladimir J.N., Crown, John, Wiman, Klas G., Duffy, Michael J.·2018·Translational Oncology

Abstract

TP53 is the most frequently mutated gene in human cancer and thus an attractive target for novel cancer therapy. Several compounds that can reactive mutant p53 protein have been identified. APR-246 is currently being tested in a phase II clinical trial in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. We have used RNA-seq analysis to study the effects of APR-246 on gene expression in human breast cancer cell lines. Although the effect of APR-246 on gene expression was largely cell line dependent, six genes were upregulated across all three cell lines studied, i.e., TRIM16, SLC7A11, TXNRD1, SRXN1, LOC344887, and SLC7A11-AS1. We did not detect upregulation of canonical p53 target genes such as CDKN1A (p21), 14-3-3σ, BBC3 (PUMA), and PMAIP1 (NOXA) by RNA-seq, but these genes were induced according to analysis by qPCR. Gene ontology analysis showed that APR-246 induced changes in pathways such as response to oxidative stress, gene expression, cell proliferation, response to nitrosative stress, and the glutathione biosynthesis process. Our results are consistent with the dual action of APR-246, i.e., reactivation of mutant p53 and modulation of redox activity. SLC7A11, TRIM16, TXNRD1, and SRXN1 are potential new pharmacodynamic biomarkers for assessing the response to APR-246 in both preclinical and clinical studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.08.009

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous unbiased investigation of transcriptome changes in response to eprenetapopt treatment in cancer cells detected no changes to p53 target genes but up-regulation of oxidative stress response genes, including SLC7A11.

    “previous unbiased investigation of the changes to the transcriptome in response to eprenetapopt treatment in cancer cells, which detected no changes to p53 target genes but up-regulation of oxidative stress response genes, including SLC7A11 (13, 35)”

    From Eprenetapopt triggers ferroptosis, inhibits NFS1 cysteine desulfurase, and synergizes with serine and glycine dietary restriction (2022) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Abstract and Discussion report that APR-246 upregulated SLC7A11 and other redox-associated genes in breast cancer cells. The Discussion says RNA-seq did not detect upregulation of several canonical p53 target genes, but qPCR found that those genes increased. Thus, “no changes to p53 target genes” is broader than the paper’s RNA-seq finding. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Synnott, N. C., Madden, S. F., Bykov, V. J. N., Crown, J., Wiman, K. G., & Duffy, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • St. Vincent's University Hospital (IE)
Corresponding author
Duffy, Michael J.
Venue
Translational Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
1343-1349
ISSN
1936-5233 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2891832048
Cited by
35
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Translational Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Irish Cancer Society Collaborative Cancer Research Centre BREAST-PREDICT (CCRC13GAL)
  • Cancer Clinical Research Trust
  • Swedish Cancer Society (Cancerfonden
  • Swedish Research Council (VR)
  • Radiumhemmets Forskningsfonder
  • ERC Advanced (TRANSREAD 694825)
  • Karolinska Institutet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
Keywords
APR-246, mutant p53, p53 reactivation, breast cancer, reactive oxygen species, oxidative stress, nitrosative stress, glutathione synthesis, SLC7A11, TRIM16, thioredoxin reductase 1, SRXN1, pharmacodynamic biomarkers, gene expression profiling, redox regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review