The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transportation resilience to climate change and extreme weather events – Beyond risk and robustness
Open accessAbstract
The long-term reliability and functioning of transportation systems will increasingly need to consider and plan for climate change and extreme weather events. Transportation systems have largely been designed and operated for historical climate conditions that are now often exceeded. Emerging knowledge of how to plan for climate change largely embraces risk-based thinking favoring more robust infrastructure designs. However, there remain questions about whether this approach is sufficient given the uncertainty and non-stationarity of the climate, and many other driving factors affecting transportation systems (e.g., funding, rapid technological change, population and utilization shifts, etc.). This paper examines existing research and knowledge related to the vulnerability of the transportation system to climate change and extreme weather events and finds that there are both direct and indirect “pathways of disruption.” Direct pathways of disruption consist of both abrupt impacts to physical infrastructure and impacts via non-physical factors such as human health, behavior, and decision making. Similarly, indirect pathways of disruption result from interconnections with other critical infrastructure and social systems. Currently, the direct pathways appear to receive much of the focus in vulnerability and risk assessments, and the predominant approach for addressing these pathways of disruption emphasizes strengthening and armoring infrastructure (robustness) guided by risk analysis. However, our analysis reveals that indirect pathways of disruption can have meaningful impacts, while also being less amenable to robustness-based approaches. As a result, we posit that concepts like flexibility and agility appear to be well suited to complement the status quo of robustness by addressing the indirect and non-physical pathways of disruption that often prove challenging - thereby improving the resilience of transportation systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An introduction to cybernetics
Ashby, W. R. (1956) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.5851 · Cited by 7,578
Stationarity Is Dead: Whither Water Management?
Milly, P. C. D., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R. M., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Lettenmaier, D. P., & Stouffer, R. J. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1151915 · Cited by 4,537
Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations
Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391211 · Cited by 3,937
Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment
(2014) · doi:10.7930/j0z31wj2 · Cited by 2,414 · cited 2×
“…the future, there is ample evidence to suggest that even in conservative scenarios (where greenhouse gas emissions are significantly reduced in the short term) extreme events and gradual changes to climate and hydrology are likely to become more severe (Stocker et al., 2013; Melillo et al., 2014).”
BackgroundOrganization theory: modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-3404 · Cited by 2,156
Increasing western US forest wildfire activity: sensitivity to changes in the timing of spring
Westerling, A. L. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0178 · Cited by 1,322
Yusuf, Y. Y., Sarhadi, M., & Gunasekaran, A. (1999) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/s0925-5273(98)00219-9 · Cited by 1,154
The impact of climate change and weather on transport: An overview of empirical findings
Koetse, M. J., & Rietveld, P. (2009) · Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2008.12.004 · Cited by 903
Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering
Woods, D. D. (2015) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.018 · Cited by 880
A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes
Sherehiy, B., Karwowski, W., & Layer, J. K. (2007) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2007.01.007 · Cited by 775
Cited by
Markolf, S. A., Chester, M. V., Eisenberg, D. A., Iwaniec, D. M., Davidson, C. I., Zimmerman, R., Miller, T. R., Ruddell, B. L., & Chang, H. (2018) · Earth's Future · doi:10.1029/2018ef000926 · Cited by 312
Self-citationUrban Transportation Networks Resilience: Indicators, Disturbances, and Assessment Methods
Serdar, M. Z., Koç, M., & Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2022) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.103452 · Cited by 292
Jang, J., Sung, M., & Hwang, J. (2026) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.181269 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Markolf, S. A., Hoehne, C., Fraser, A., Chester, M. V., & Underwood, B. S.
- Venue
- Transport Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 74
- Pages
- 174-186
- ISSN
- 0967-070X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2738040769
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 15.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transportation resilience to climate change and extreme weather events – Beyond risk and robustness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.11.003
- The paper
- Markolf, S. A., Hoehne, C., Fraser, A., Chester, M. V., & Underwood, B. S. (2019). Transportation resilience to climate change and extreme weather events – Beyond risk and robustness. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.11.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.