Cited by 45Transportation Planning and OptimizationTraffic control and managementTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques

Solving a Dynamic User Equilibrium model based on splitting rates with Gradient Projection algorithms

Open access
Gentile, Guido·2016·Transportation Research Part B Methodological

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trb.2016.02.005

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Traditional efforts to solve congestion problems have been centred on moving demand to transit and better managing road traffic using traffic simulation, dynamic network loading equilibria, and dynamic models.

    “Traditional efforts to solve congestion problems have been centred in attempts to move the demand on the transit system [96] and on a better management of road traffic using tools such as traffic simulation [97][98][99][100][101][102], dynamic network loading equilibria, and dynamic models [103,104] for the simulation and management of user route choice [105-109].”

    From A Review of Blockchain-Based Systems in Transportation (2019) · cites this paper as [104]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Heydecker B., Addison J. (1998) Traffic models for dynamic traffic assignment. In Transport networks: recent methodological advances, ed M.G.H. Bell, Pergamon- Elsevier, Oxford, UK, pp. 35-49.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gentile, G.
Affiliations
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Gentile, Guido
Venue
Transportation Research Part B Methodological
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
92
Pages
120-147
ISSN
0191-2615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2337933353
Cited by
45
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4
FWCI
7.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transportation Research Part B Methodological (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Keywords
dynamic user equilibrium, dynamic traffic assignment, gradient projection algorithm, turning motion, variational inequalities, path-based formulation, gap function, convergence analysis, bottleneck link, macroscopic traffic model, method of successive averages, time discretization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review