The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Variable speed limit: A microscopic analysis in a connected vehicle environment
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a Variable Speed Limit (VSL) control algorithm for simultaneously maximizing the mobility, safety and environmental benefit in a Connected Vehicle environment. Development of Connected Vehicle (CV)/Autonomous Vehicle (AV) technology has the potential to provide essential data at the microscopic level to provide a better understanding of real-time driver behavior. This paper investigated a VSL control algorithm using a microscopic approach by focusing on individual driver’s behavior (e.g., acceleration and deceleration) through the use of Model Predictive Control (MPC) approach. A multi-objective optimization function was formulated with the aim of finding a balanced trade-off among mobility, safety and sustainability. A microscopic traffic flow prediction model was used to calculate Total Travel Time (TTT); a surrogate safety measure Time To Collision (TTC) was used to measure instantaneous safety; and, a microscopic fuel consumption model (VT-Micro) was used to measure the environmental impact. Real-time driver’s compliance to the posted speed limit was used to adjust the optimal speed limit values. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to compare the performance of the developed approach for different weights in the objective function and for two different percentages of CV. The results showed that with 100% penetration rate, the developed VSL approach outperformed the uncontrolled scenario consistently, resulting in up to 20% of total travel time reductions, 6–11% of safety improvements and 5–16% reduction in fuel consumptions. Our findings revealed that the scenario which optimized for safety alone, resulted in more optimum improvements as compared to the multi-criteria optimization. Thus, one can argue that in case of 100% penetration rates of CVs, optimizing for safety alone is enough to achieve simultaneous and optimum improvements in all measures. However, mixed results were obtained in case of lower % penetration rate which showed higher collision risk when optimizing for only mobility or fuel consumption. This indicates that with such % penetration rate, multi-criteria optimization is crucial to realize optimum and balanced benefits for the examined measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations
Treiber, M., Hennecke, A., & Helbing, D. (2000) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.62.1805 · Cited by 4,762
Predictive Control With Constraints
Maciejowski, J. M. (2001) · Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database · Cited by 4,368
Predictive control with constraints
Camacho, E. F. (2003) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(03)00056-6 · Cited by 3,530
Nonlinear Follow-the-Leader Models of Traffic Flow
Gazis, D. C., Herman, R., & Rothery, R. W. (1961) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.9.4.545 · Cited by 1,518
General Lane-Changing Model MOBIL for Car-Following Models
Kesting, A., Treiber, M., & Helbing, D. (2007) · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/1999-10 · Cited by 1,345
Herrera, J. C., Work, D. B., Herring, R., Ban, X. (., Jacobson, Q., & Bayen, A. M. (2010) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2009.10.006 · Cited by 915
A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, part I: General theory
Newell, G. F. (1993) · Transportation Research Part B: Methodological · doi:10.1016/0191-2615(93)90038-c · Cited by 841
NEAR-MISS DETERMINATION THROUGH USE OF A SCALE OF DANGER
Hayward, J. C. (1972) · Highway Research Record · Cited by 720
Freeway ramp metering: an overview
Papageorgiou, M., & Kotsialos, A. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2002.806803 · Cited by 701
Surrogate Safety Measures from Traffic Simulation Models
Gettman, D., & Head, L. (2003) · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/1840-12 · Cited by 675
Cited by
Milakis, D., van Arem, B., & van Wee, B. (2017) · Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1080/15472450.2017.1291351 · Cited by 963
A Survey on Cooperative Longitudinal Motion Control of Multiple Connected and Automated Vehicles
Wang, Z., Bian, Y., Shladover, S. E., Wu, G., Li, S. E., & Barth, M. J. (2020) · IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/mits.2019.2953562 · Cited by 316
Impacts of Autonomous Vehicles on Greenhouse Gas Emissions—Positive or Negative?
Massar, M., Reza, I., Rahman, S. M., Abdullah, S. M. H., Jamal, A., & Al-Ismail, F. S. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18115567 · Cited by 146
Jang, J., Ko, J., Park, J., Oh, C., & Kim, S. (2020) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105675 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Khondaker, B., & Kattan, L.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 58
- Pages
- 146-159
- ISSN
- 0968-090X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1470377755
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 19.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variable speed limit: A microscopic analysis in a connected vehicle environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.trc.2015.07.014
- The paper
- Khondaker, B., & Kattan, L. (2015). Variable speed limit: A microscopic analysis in a connected vehicle environment. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.07.014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.