The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incentives for promoting Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) adoption in Norway
Open accessAbstract
Norway has become a global forerunner in the field of electromobility and the BEV market share is far higher than in any other country. One likely reason for this is strong incentives for promoting purchase and ownership of BEVs. The purpose of this study is to describe the role of incentives for promoting BEVs, and to determine what incentives are critical for deciding to buy a BEV and what groups of buyers respond to different types of incentives. The questions are answered with data from a survey among nearly 3400 BEV owners in Norway. Exemptions from purchase tax and VAT are critical incentives for more than 80% of the respondents. This is very much in line with previous research, which suggests that up-front price reduction is the most powerful incentive in promoting EV adoption. To a substantial number of BEV owners, however, exemption from road tolling or bus lane access is the only decisive factor. Analyses show that there are clear delineations between incentive groups, both in terms of age, gender, and education. Income is a less prominent predictor, which probably results from the competitive price of BEVs in the Norwegian market. Perhaps most interesting is the assumed relation between incentives and character of transport systems the respondents engage in.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Drazin, R. (1991) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/bf02371446 · Cited by 2,122
Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N. (2013) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.004 · Cited by 722
Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in Germany
Plötz, P., Schneider, U., Globisch, J., & Dütschke, E. (2014) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2014.06.006 · Cited by 517
Cited by
A Review of Battery Fires in Electric Vehicles
Sun, P., Bisschop, R., Niu, H., & Huang, X. (2020) · Fire Technology · doi:10.1007/s10694-019-00944-3 · Cited by 891
Adoption of electric vehicle: A literature review and prospects for sustainability
Kumar, R. R., & Alok, K. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119911 · Cited by 871
A review of factors influencing consumer intentions to adopt battery electric vehicles
Li, W., Long, R., Chen, H., & Geng, J. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.076 · Cited by 560
She, Z.-Y., Sun, Q., Ma, J.-J., & Xie, B.-C. (2017) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.001 · Cited by 435
Consumer purchase intention of electric vehicles in China: The roles of perception and personality
He, X., Zhan, W., & Hu, Y. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.260 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Bjerkan, K. Y., Nørbech, T. E., & Nordtømme, M. E.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 43
- Pages
- 169-180
- ISSN
- 1361-9209 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2240096274
- Cited by
- 654
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 21.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incentives for promoting Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) adoption in Norway. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.trd.2015.12.002
- The paper
- Bjerkan, K. Y., Nørbech, T. E., & Nordtømme, M. E. (2016). Incentives for promoting Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) adoption in Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.12.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.