Cited by 641Supply Chain Resilience and Risk ManagementSupply Chain and Inventory ManagementFacility Location and Emergency Management

A decision support system for demand management in healthcare supply chains considering the epidemic outbreaks: A case study of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Open access
Govindan, Kannan, Mina, Hassan, Alavi, Behrouz·2020·Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review

Abstract

The disasters caused by epidemic outbreaks is different from other disasters due to two specific features: their long-term disruption and their increasing propagation. Not controlling such disasters brings about severe disruptions in the supply chains and communities and, thereby, irreparable losses will come into play. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is one of these disasters that has caused severe disruptions across the world and in many supply chains, particularly in the healthcare supply chain. Therefore, this paper, for the first time, develops a practical decision support system based on physicians' knowledge and fuzzy inference system (FIS) in order to help with the demand management in the healthcare supply chain, to reduce stress in the community, to break down the COVID-19 propagation chain, and, generally, to mitigate the epidemic outbreaks for healthcare supply chain disruptions. This approach first divides community residents into four groups based on the risk level of their immune system (namely, very sensitive, sensitive, slightly sensitive, and normal) and by two indicators of age and pre-existing diseases (such as diabetes, heart problems, or high blood pressure). Then, these individuals are classified and are required to observe the regulations of their class. Finally, the efficiency of the proposed approach was measured in the real world using the information from four users and the results showed the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed approach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tre.2020.101967

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tomasini Rolando Wassenhove Luk Van Humanitarian Logistics 2009 Palgrave Macmillan UK London

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Govindan, K., Mina, H., & Alavi, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • University of Tehran (IR)
  • Sharif University of Technology (IR)
Corresponding author
Govindan, Kannan
Venue
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
138
Pages
101967
ISSN
1366-5545 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3023414002
Cited by
641
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 126 · 2022: 160 · 2021: 154 · 2020: 38
FWCI
127.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Facility Location and Emergency Management
Keywords
decision support system, healthcare supply chain, demand management, COVID-19 pandemic, infectious disease outbreaks, supply chain disruption, fuzzy inference system, physician knowledge, risk group classification, pre-existing disease, age, pandemic mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review