Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 639

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is conservation triage just smart decision making?

Bottrill, Madeleine C., Joseph, Liana N., Carwardine, Josie, Bode, Michael, Cook, Carly, Game, Edward T., Grantham, Hedley, Kark, Salit, Linke, Simon, McDonald-Madden, Eve, Pressey, Robert L., Walker, Susan, Wilson, Kerrie A., Possingham, Hugh P.·2008·Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tree.2008.07.007

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. McBride, 2007, Incorporating the effects of socioeconomic uncertainty into priority setting for conservation investment, Conserv. Biol., 21, 1463, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00832.x · DOI
  2. Hobbs, 2003, What happens if we cannot fix it? Triage, palliative care and setting priorities in salinising landscapes, Aust. J. Bot., 51, 647, 10.1071/BT02109 · doi:10.1071/bt02109
  3. Kennedy, 1996, Triage: techniques and applications in decision making, Ann. Emerg. Med., 28, 136, 10.1016/S0196-0644(96)70053-7 · doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70053-7
  4. Pimm, 2000, Against triage, Science, 289, 2289, 10.1126/science.289.5488.2289 · doi:10.1126/science.289.5488.2289
  5. Noss, 1996, Conservation or convenience, Conserv. Biol., 10, 921, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10040921.x · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10040921.x
  6. Watts, 2004, Triage: appropriate for prioritizing community funded river restoration projects, but not for advancing the science of river restoration, Ecol. Manage. Restor., 5, 73, 10.1111/j.1442-8903.2004.180-4.x · doi:10.1111/j.1442-8903.2004.180-4.x
  7. Joseph, L.N. et al. Evaluating costs, benefits and probability of success for threatened species management: a project prioritisation protocol. Conserv. Biol. (in press)
  8. Noss, 2004, Conservation targets and information needs for regional conservation planning, Nat. Areas J., 24, 223
  9. Shickle, 1997, Public preferences for health care: prioritisation in the United Kingdom, Bioethics, 11, 277, 10.1111/1467-8519.00067 · doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00067
  10. Shrader-Frechette, 1994, Biodiversity, biological uncertainty and setting conservation priorities, Biol. Philos., 9, 167, 10.1007/BF00857931 · doi:10.1007/bf00857931
  11. Morrison, 2007, Facing the dilemma at eradication’s end: uncertainty of absence and the Lazarus effect, Front. Ecol. Environ., 5, 271, 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[271:FTDAEE]2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[271:ftdaee]2.0.co;2

Cited by

See all 639

Metadata

Authors
Bottrill, M. C., Joseph, L. N., Carwardine, J., Bode, M., Cook, C., Game, E. T., Grantham, H., Kark, S., Linke, S., McDonald-Madden, E., Pressey, R. L., Walker, S., Wilson, K. A., & Possingham, H. P.
Venue
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
23
Issue
12
Pages
649-654
ISSN
0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111333045
Cited by
639
References
32
FWCI
17.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is conservation triage just smart decision making? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tree.2008.07.007
The paper
Bottrill, M. C., Joseph, L. N., Carwardine, J., Bode, M., Cook, C., Game, E. T., Grantham, H., Kark, S., Linke, S., McDonald-Madden, E., Pressey, R. L., Walker, S., Wilson, K. A., & Possingham, H. P. (2008). Is conservation triage just smart decision making? Trends in Ecology & Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.07.007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.