The interplay of past diversification and evolutionary isolation with present imperilment across the amphibian tree of life
Abstract
Human activities continue to erode the tree of life, requiring us to prioritize research and conservation. Amphibians represent key victims and bellwethers of global change, and the need for action to conserve them is drastically outpacing knowledge. We provide a phylogeny incorporating nearly all extant amphibians (7,238 species). Current amphibian diversity is composed of both older, depauperate lineages and extensive, more recent tropical radiations found in select clades. Frog and salamander diversification increased strongly after the Cretaceous-Palaeogene boundary, preceded by a potential mass-extinction event in salamanders. Diversification rates of subterranean caecilians varied little over time. Biogeographically, the Afro- and Neotropics harbour a particularly high proportion of Gondwanan relicts, comprising species with high evolutionary distinctiveness (ED). These high-ED species represent a large portion of the branches in the present tree: around 28% of all phylogenetic diversity comes from species in the top 10% of ED. The association between ED and imperilment is weak, but many species with high ED are now imperilled or lack formal threat status, suggesting opportunities for integrating evolutionary position and phylogenetic heritage in addressing the current extinction crisis. By providing a phylogenetic estimate for extant amphibians and identifying their threats and ED, we offer a preliminary basis for a quantitatively informed global approach to conserving the amphibian tree of life.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A. ordinarium and A. dumerilii diverged within the last 1 million years.
“A. ordinarium and A. dumerilii diverged within the last 1 mya (Jetz & Pyron, 2018)”
From The neoteny goldilocks zone: The evolution of neoteny in <i>Ambystoma</i> (2024) · cites this paper as Jetz & Pyron, 2018
Cites
Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity
Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., Mace, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11148 · Cited by 7,457 · see citing works
Defaunation in the Anthropocene
Dirzo, R., Young, H. S., Galetti, M., Ceballos, G., Isaac, N. J. B., & Collen, B. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1251817 · Cited by 4,305 · see citing works
Biodiversity: The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers
Maxwell, S. L., Fuller, R. A., Brooks, T. M., & Watson, J. E. M. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/536143a · Cited by 1,979 · see citing works
Widespread amphibian extinctions from epidemic disease driven by global warming
Alan Pounds, J., Bustamante, M. R., Coloma, L. A., Consuegra, J. A., Fogden, M. P. L., Foster, P. N., La Marca, E., Masters, K. L., Merino-Viteri, A., Puschendorf, R., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04246 · Cited by 1,960 · see citing works
Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians
Wake, D. B., & Vredenburg, V. T. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0801921105 · Cited by 1,786 · see citing works
Impacts of the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification
Meredith, R. W., Janečka, J. E., Gatesy, J., Ryder, O. A., Fisher, C. A., Teeling, E. C., Goodbla, A., Eizirik, E., Simão, T. L. L., Stadler, T., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1211028 · Cited by 1,464 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shortfalls and opportunities in terrestrial vertebrate species discovery
Moura, M. R., & Jetz, W. (2021) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01411-5 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Self-citationThe neoteny goldilocks zone: The evolution of neoteny in <i>Ambystoma</i>
Lyons, T. A., & Arbuckle, K. (2024) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.11240 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“For ex - ample, A. ordinarium and A. dumerilii diverged within the last 1 mya (Jetz & Pyron, 2018), but have evolved distinct developmental strat - egies; facultative and obligate neotenic respectively.”
BackgroundMethod
- Authors
- Jetz, W., & Pyron, R. A.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- George Washington University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jetz, Walter
- Pyron, R. Alexander
- Venue
- Nature Ecology & Evolution
- Published
- 2018-03-26
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 850-858
- ISSN
- 2397-334X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2796242207
- Cited by
- 607
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 48 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 28.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Division of Biological Infrastructure
- Division of Environmental Biology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
- Keywords
- amphibians, amphibian phylogeny, diversification rates, evolutionary distinctiveness, phylogenetic diversity, extinction risk, conservation prioritization, caecilians, salamanders, frogs, Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary, mass extinction, biogeography, extinction crisis
- MeSH terms
- Amphibians, Animals, Biological Evolution, Phylogeny, Biodiversity, Extinction, Biological, Endangered Species
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review