The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Food webs: reconciling the structure and function of biodiversity
Open accessAbstract
The global biodiversity crisis concerns not only unprecedented loss of species within communities, but also related consequences for ecosystem function. Community ecology focuses on patterns of species richness and community composition, whereas ecosystem ecology focuses on fluxes of energy and materials. Food webs provide a quantitative framework to combine these approaches and unify the study of biodiversity and ecosystem function. We summarise the progression of food-web ecology and the challenges in using the food-web approach. We identify five areas of research where these advances can continue, and be applied to global challenges. Finally, we describe what data are needed in the next generation of food-web studies to reconcile the structure and function of biodiversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hutchinson, G. E. (1957) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1957.022.01.039 · Cited by 6,228
Will a Large Complex System be Stable?
MAY, R. M. (1972) · Nature · doi:10.1038/238413a0 · Cited by 2,869
The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity
Duffy, J. E., Cardinale, B. J., France, K. E., McIntyre, P. B., Thébault, E., & Loreau, M. (2007) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01037.x · Cited by 1,065
Biodiversity-ecosystem function research: Is it relevant to conservation?
Srivastava, D. S., & Vellend, M. (2005) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152636 · Cited by 712
Biodiversity loss, trophic skew and ecosystem functioning
Duffy, J. E. (2003) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00494.x · Cited by 516
Dual influences of ecosystem size and disturbance on food chain length in streams
McHugh, P. A., McIntosh, A. R., & Jellyman, P. G. (2010) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01484.x · Cited by 217
Parallel ecological networks in ecosystems
Olff, H., Alonso, D., Berg, M. P., Eriksson, B. K., Loreau, M., Piersma, T., & Rooney, N. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0222 · Cited by 188
Williams, R. J., Anandanadesan, A., & Purves, D. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012092 · Cited by 117
Cited by
Next-Generation Global Biomonitoring: Large-scale, Automated Reconstruction of Ecological Networks
Bohan, D. A., Vacher, C., Tamaddoni-Nezhad, A., Raybould, A., Dumbrell, A. J., & Woodward, G. (2017) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2017.03.001 · Cited by 200
Food‐web dynamics in a large river discontinuum
Cross, W. F., Baxter, C. V., Rosi-Marshall, E. J., Hall, R. O., Kennedy, T. A., Donner, K. C., Wellard Kelly, H. A., Seegert, S. E. Z., Behn, K. E., & Yard, M. D. (2013) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/12-1727.1 · Cited by 191
Self-citationCrabtree, S. A., Bird, D. W., & Bird, R. B. (2019) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10745-019-0053-z · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, R. M., Brose, U., Dunne, J. A., Hall, R. O., Hladyz, S., Kitching, R. L., Martinez, N. D., Rantala, H., Romanuk, T. N., Stouffer, D. B., & Tylianakis, J. M.
- Venue
- Trends in Ecology & Evolution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 689-697
- ISSN
- 0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996005503
- Cited by
- 703
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Food webs: reconciling the structure and function of biodiversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.005
- The paper
- Thompson, R. M., Brose, U., Dunne, J. A., Hall, R. O., Hladyz, S., Kitching, R. L., Martinez, N. D., Rantala, H., Romanuk, T. N., Stouffer, D. B., & Tylianakis, J. M. (2012). Food webs: reconciling the structure and function of biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
