The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Critical Review of New Mobility Services for Urban Transport
Open accessAbstract
The growing pressure on urban passenger transport systems has increased the demand for new and innovative solutions to increase its efficiency. One approach to tackle this challenge has been the slow but steady shift towards shared mobility services (car-, bike-sharing etc.). Building on these new modes and the developments in information and communication technologies, the concept of “Mobility as a Service” (MaaS) has recently come to light and offers convenient door-to-door transport without the need to own a private vehicle. The term Mobility as a Service (MaaS) stands for buying mobility services based on consumer needs instead of buying the means of mobility. In recent years, various MaaS schemes have been arisen around the world. The objective of this paper is to review these newly existing mobility services and develop an index to evaluate the level of mobility integration for each based on the assumption that higher level of integration is more appealing to travellers. The review presented in this paper allows a comparison among the schemes and provides the background and the key points of MaaS systems that the research community could use for designing surveys. It also provides significant insights to transport operators and authorities on the elements they should take into account to apply an attractive MaaS scheme that could effectively shift demand away from private vehicles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grotenhuis, J.-W., Wiegmans, B. W., & Rietveld, P. (2007) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2006.07.001 · Cited by 276
Promoting public transport as a subscription service: Effects of a free month travel card
Thøgersen, J. (2009) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.10.008 · Cited by 221
Structures of commitment in mode use: a comparison of Switzerland, Germany and Great Britain
Simma, A., & Axhausen, K. W. (2001) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/s0967-070x(01)00023-3 · Cited by 146
Mobility as a Service - A Proposal for Action for the Public Administration, Case Helsinki
Heikkilä, S. (2014) · Cited by 135
How smart is your smartcard? measuring travel behaviours, perceptions, and incentives
Lathia, N., & Capra, L. (2011) · ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp) · doi:10.1145/2030112.2030152 · Cited by 75
Impact of Transit-Pass Ownership on Daily Number of Trips Made by Urban Public Transit
(2007) · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9488(2007)133:4(242 · Cited by 28
Integration for Seamless Transport
Preston, J. (2012) · Discussion papers · doi:10.1787/5k8zvv8lmswl-en · Cited by 26
Pre-commitment and usage: Season tickets, cars and travel
Axhausen, K. W., Simma, A., & Golob, T. F. (2000) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-a-004232256 · Cited by 17
Cited by
Mobility as a Service: A Critical Review of Definitions, Assessments of Schemes, and Key Challenges
Jittrapirom, P., Caiati, V., Feneri, A.-M., Ebrahimigharehbaghi, S., González, M. J. A., & Narayan, J. (2017) · Urban Planning · doi:10.17645/up.v2i2.931 · Cited by 850
Nikitas, A., Michalakopoulou, K., Njoya, E. T., & Karampatzakis, D. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12072789 · Cited by 495
Questioning mobility as a service: Unanticipated implications for society and governance
Pangbourne, K., Mladenović, M. N., Stead, D., & Milakis, D. (2020) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.033 · Cited by 304
Alonso-González, M. J., Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., van Oort, N., Cats, O., & Hoogendoorn, S. (2020) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.022 · Cited by 283
The potential of mobility as a service bundles as a mobility management tool
Matyas, M., & Kamargianni, M. (2019) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-018-9913-4 · Cited by 266
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kamargianni, M., Li, W., Matyas, M., & Schäfer, A.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Procedia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 14
- Pages
- 3294-3303
- ISSN
- 2352-1457 (ISSN-L)
- 2352-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2461992254
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 27.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Critical Review of New Mobility Services for Urban Transport. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.277
- The paper
- Kamargianni, M., Li, W., Matyas, M., & Schäfer, A. (2016). A Critical Review of New Mobility Services for Urban Transport. Transportation Research Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.277
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.